It is with grate sadness that I, Shontavia J. Trump, must inform you that my husband Tyrone was found deceased in the toilets of a KFC before they even give me my fried chicken. Now they axe me to write a statement for the popo but I is too stupid to spell Shontavia, deceased or KFC.
Yeah no, flack it, clever/funny/racist introductions are so 2018.
For as I long as I had this blog, I’ve been a big proponent of getting the pro-White message outside of the political arena and into the social and cultural world.
I never really followed the news, and since my last post I had completely disconnected out of boredom for faux angtsy political diatribes about “he gun take are guns” or “he gun take are immigrants“.
I don’t know, nor do I care, if Donald Trump has had Mexican babies cremated (like the progressive Hitler), issued an amnesty for illegal immigrants (like the conservative Reagan), got a blowjob in the oval office from a big-nosed jewess (would that be incest?), handed over the International Space Station to Putin (so he build Nazi death stars to match the nazi death camps), done all of the above, or simply been impeached for his incompetence.
I seriously don’t know. It’s not virtue-signalling, it just shows the limits of political power – I guess it could be classified as “hard power” relative to the media and entertainment industries – when dealing with pro-White/anti-White issues.
Politics are almost meaningless in the current year.
What matters is culture. The “White Genocide” meme and the “Anti-racist is a code word for anti-White” talking points are A+, and mentioning the anti-White <=> anti-Palestinian connection makes it A++. And doing everything Tyrone says makes it A+++, but that’s only because of affirmative actions.
This post is about consumerism, sub-cultures, multiculturalism and group psychology.
Hipster Racist writes:
Whether we like it or not, we Northern Europeans are not “racist” – not “tribal” – like most other humans. It’s a twist of our cognition evolved through millions of years in harsh winter climates. We need an overarching “moral system” to define our ingroup and outgroup, and we engage in “altruistic punishment” when an ingroup member violates that moral system. When our moral system breaks down, we revert back to our individualism and can’t cooperate.
Hence, in America, when a white guy can’t take the anti-white “political correctness” anymore, he reverts to “libertarianism” and denounces “collectivism.” Hence, in Northern Ireland, two white ethnic groups, virtually indistinguishable to outsiders, were locked in a pitched battle divided by barely-conflicting “moral systems.” Hence, the Scottish independence party wants to secede from Great Britain and form an independent Scotland … so they can import more “diversity” via mass non-white immigration.
We only became “white” when we discovered “blacks.” Dixie had the most white solidarity because they were surrounded by blacks. Our “moral system” is no longer Christianity – and it’s no longer “liberalism” and “progressivism” either. It’s now anti-white globalist imperialism and the moral system is proselytized by the electronic mass media which is controlled by anti-white ethnic Ashkenazi Jews who are vastly more racist and tribal than us.
Which is why “white nationalism” is all but illegal on social media, because we pro-whites are extremely successful at convincing our fellow whites to reject anti-white globalist imperialism preached by anti-white ethnic Ashkenazi Jews via the electronic mass media.
I’ll play Devil’s advocate and contest the part I emphasized, specifically that the new “moral system” is strictly anti-White.
I would agree that we are post-Christian, post-liberal and certainly post-progressive. Perhaps also post-capitalist, depending on how you define capitalism (a word never properly define IMO, not even by its jewish creator) – the entertainment and advertisement industries are growing exponentially, and thus the “trade” of capital is increasingly indirect, and often more complex that a two party exchange like was common a century ago.
But this modern form of post-capitalism has led to consumerism, and the combination of consumerism and lack of tribal identity – with social and sometimes even legal repression directed towards White racial fraternity – has led to the emergence of sub-cultures – what I called “sub-culturalism” a while back.
To be more specific, I would say that the lack of tribal identity has left a void that Whites are trying to fill with ideology: first religion, then politics, now consumer identity.
So in the political sphere alone, yes, the new “moral system” of the masses is whatever the jewish media says.
But in the social, cultural and sometimes economic fields, it’s a different story precisely because of sub-culturalism, and the ingroup / outgroup relationship is a bit different from the “White = Bad, Color = Good” that dominates the political debate.
Important to note: sub-culturalism = consumerism + lack of tribal identity. Blacks, Arabs and Asians can be “gamers”, but they can’t be Gamers – as in #Gamergate – because most would never trade their racial identities for something as ephemeral as consumer culture.
Likewise and more generally, there are many jewish homosexuals, even “LGBT” militants, and Black “feminists”, and Mestizo “environmentalists”, etc… but it’s pretty clear once you scratch a bit under the surface that these various causes are often just camouflage for identity politics – the cause conceals and sometimes complements, but never replaces, the underlying racial brotherhood. But a White person who defines himself as an “LGBT” advocate? That’s a different story.
Back to mercantile sub-culturalism.
Whether it’s because of Northern European “pathological altruism” – see the work of Kevin MacDonald – or because Whites are the most virulently targeted by multiculturalism’s craziest fanatics – ex. “is your baby racist?” – or a combination of both, Whites can and do trade their racial identity for a consumer identity, just as they once traded their racial identity for a religious identity, or a political identity, etc.
To summarize, I would agree with the quote in bold but only in the context of political partisanship.
In politics, the White “moral system” becomes the race towards sentimental and hypocritical mock compassion – histrionic outrage at “offensive jokes” while bombing the Middle-East or crying for Mexican babies while turning a blind eye to Gaza – and telescopic charity towards refugees at the expense of, for example, urban homelessness, the synthetic opioid crisis, killers clowns, etc.
In doing so, new tribal identities are formed: the “us” – tolerant, compassionate, loving, etc. – vs the “them” – the hateful, the bigoted, the extremists, the Nazis.
Which brings us to the infamous concept of supremacy. The “us” is always superior to the “them”, and that pleases the members of the “us” while reaffirming the dogmas of individualism – they are part of the superior tribe X, and by choice at that, so they are doubly superior to the “sheep” that watch Fox News/CNN.
Something to note is that this system is very authoritarian in a “top-down” fashion, and there is very little room for divergence. You can’t be 75% “us”, as former-progressives getting swarmed by the Multikult for decade old emails can attest.
In social, cultural and perhaps economic matters, the “White moral” system isn’t as simple as with politics.
Sub-culturalism dictates that the new tribal identities are formed organically, and completely artificially, around shared hobbies or interests. That, perhaps even more so than with politics, has the benefit of signalling the adherent’s individualism.
And as with politics, the subject gets to feel “superior” to outsiders – ex. gamers are “superior” to frat boys, fans of foreign films are “superior” to indiscriminate blockbuster viewers, vegans are of course “superior” to meat eaters, etc.
Where they differ – aside from the former being authoritarian/top-down and the latter being organic, quasi-anarchistic – is that since the social/sub-cultural groups aren’t political in nature, what constitutes their “us” isn’t necessarily related to the precepts of anti-White identity politics. And we all know the ladder tolerates no dissent (I can’t remember the blogger who came up with the term “convergence”).
For example, the “anime fan” sub-culture has tacit rules of what constitutes an “us” or ingroup, and a “them” or outgroup. But these rules aren’t likely to be political in nature, they’d probably be about appreciation of trend A, disdain for trend B, dress codes, jargon, etc. The result is one can be 1) a pro-White anime fan, 2) an anti-White anime fan, or 3) a TRUE anime fan who “doesn’t care about politics” – the latter having completely abandoned his racial identity and opted to define himself solely through his hobby.
What happens when two of these groups clash? Hashtag-Gate.
You know: #Gamergate, #Metalgate, #Marvelgate, #FIFAgate, #Star(wars)gate, #Niggate, #IbrokeTaylorSwiftsgateswhenshewastwelve, etc.
Sub-culture A has its own rules and mores, and the mainstream (the multikult) comes in unilaterally demanding they do more for “minorities, people of color and immigrants” under the threat of creating a anti-racist scandal and slandering them as “nazis”.
Sure, the initial reaction by the members of targeted sub-culture will be some pointless “I have a Black friend” or “Dems R Real Raciss” circle-jerk, but once they start feeling the pressure of the multikult machine – not the most efficient monster, but what it lacks in efficacy it makes up for in relentlessness and impunity – they will grow resentful of anti-Whites.
From there, it’s very easy to covertly inoculate the unwary members of said sub-culture with pro-White talking points. How much better off would the pro-White movement be if #Gamergate, to name only the most consequential (for now) of the scandals, had been co-opted by the then emerging Alt-Right – or better, the Bob Whitaker / White Genocide Mantra crowd – rather than Breitbart, Fox News and the very worst of the CivNats (civic nationalism, particularly in such a racially diverse country as the USA, is another form of sub-culturalism).
Consumerism + Lack of tribal identity = Sub-culturalism
Sub-culturalism + Politics = X-gate conflict
X-gate conflict + pro-White talking points = Victory
Every new hashtag-gate, whether genuine or manufactured, is an opportunity to spread pro-White gospel. Culturally. That means outside of the political echo chamber (there was a study done a while back on conservative and liberal twitter users, and it was found that they almost never interacted with each other -> the definition of an echo chamber).
The Manufactured Crisis
I.e. how to create a Hashtag-gate.
I’ve written a lot about that in the past, but the short version is:
1) find something where a lot of White congregate (not necessarily physically)
2) call it racist
3) hint at “all White people are racist”, more or less overtly depending on the target audience
4) (optional) have someone else use pro-White talking points like “anti-racist is a code word for anti-White”
5) (optional) bomb Israel
Taylor Swift fan: My daughters love Taylor Swift and I have to admit it’s the one CD that they have, that I love to play in the car. Taylor Swift is a very talented, and very sensible young lady, with a wonderful, positive message to young girls. Listen to the words of her song “Fifteen”. Those are words I want my girls to remember someday when they are fourteen and fifteen and are trying to figure their lives out!
COINTYRONEPRO #1: ^ Your white privilege is showing. What a surprise that you also like Taylor Shit, the embodiment of white privilege and institutional racism in America. You, and Taylor Shit, talk about being “fifteen” but do you know how many Minorities and People of Color are killed before reaching that age by racist police officers, white supremacist and the KKK? No, then I suggest you either shut up and LISTEN when Minorities are speaking, or simply kill yourself.
COINTYRONEPRO #2: Wow. Overreacting much? Someone mentions they like Taylor Swift and you tell them to kill themselves? For liking Taylor Swift? Or for being White? It seems that your ‘anti-racism’ is just ethnic bigotry towards White people. Are you perhaps Jewish? That would explain you being so neurotically anti-White, and so vulgar towards someone expressing his/her opinion in a cordial manner.
COINTYRONEPRO #1: (optional) Fuck off racist nazi, I shit on Palestine.
Rules for Genitals: it doesn’t need to be coherent as long as it is militant. See the comments of this thread.
The goals of this variation on the Tyrone Doctrine are two-fold: 1) to expose anti-Whites as the hateful neurotic authoritarians they are 2) to get pro-White talking points out of the political sphere and into the cultural realm, by any means necessary.
There’s little point in engaging some who calls himself “BaruchGoldsteinWasRight” and makes gulag and white phosphorus jokes. In fact, with all the partisanship, confirmation bias, paid provocateurs and drama surrounding the political scene, even the most well-crafted propaganda – i.e. Whitaker – will fall on deaf ears.
The tools are already there, all that’s needed is to start using them properly: culturally, not politically.
Back to hibernation.