Politics + Hate = Consumerism + Gate

Politics + Hate = Consumerism + Gate

Tyrone J. Trump, dead?

Tyrone J. Trump, dead?

It is with grate sadness that I, Shontavia J. Trump, must inform you that my husband Tyrone was found deceased in the toilets of a KFC before they even give me my fried chicken. Now they axe me to write a statement for the popo but I is too stupid to spell Shontavia, deceased or KFC.

Yeah no, flack it, clever/funny/racist introductions are so 2018.

For as I long as I had this blog, I’ve been a big proponent of getting the pro-White message outside of the political arena and into the social and cultural world.

I never really followed the news, and since my last post I had completely disconnected out of boredom for faux angtsy political diatribes about “he gun take are guns” or “he gun take are immigrants“.

"Diversity" means no White people.

“Diversity” means no White people.

I don’t know, nor do I care, if Donald Trump has had Mexican babies cremated (like the progressive Hitler), issued an amnesty for illegal immigrants (like the conservative Reagan), got a blowjob in the oval office from a big-nosed jewess (would that be incest?), handed over the International Space Station to Putin (so he build Nazi death stars to match the nazi death camps), done all of the above, or simply been impeached for his incompetence.

I seriously don’t know. It’s not virtue-signalling, it just shows the limits of political power – I guess it could be classified as “hard power” relative to the media and entertainment industries – when dealing with pro-White/anti-White issues.

Politics are almost meaningless in the current year.

What matters is culture. The “White Genocide” meme and the “Anti-racist is a code word for anti-White” talking points are A+, and mentioning the anti-White <=> anti-Palestinian connection makes it A++. And doing everything Tyrone says makes it A+++, but that’s only because of affirmative actions.

This post is about consumerism, sub-cultures, multiculturalism and group psychology.

Hipster Racist writes:

Whether we like it or not, we Northern Europeans are not “racist” – not “tribal” – like most other humans. It’s a twist of our cognition evolved through millions of years in harsh winter climates. We need an overarching “moral system” to define our ingroup and outgroup, and we engage in “altruistic punishment” when an ingroup member violates that moral system. When our moral system breaks down, we revert back to our individualism and can’t cooperate.

Hence, in America, when a white guy can’t take the anti-white “political correctness” anymore, he reverts to “libertarianism” and denounces “collectivism.” Hence, in Northern Ireland, two white ethnic groups, virtually indistinguishable to outsiders, were locked in a pitched battle divided by barely-conflicting “moral systems.” Hence, the Scottish independence party wants to secede from Great Britain and form an independent Scotland … so they can import more “diversity” via mass non-white immigration.

[…]

We only became “white” when we discovered “blacks.” Dixie had the most white solidarity because they were surrounded by blacks. Our “moral system” is no longer Christianity – and it’s no longer “liberalism” and “progressivism” either. It’s now anti-white globalist imperialism and the moral system is proselytized by the electronic mass media which is controlled by anti-white ethnic Ashkenazi Jews who are vastly more racist and tribal than us.

Which is why “white nationalism” is all but illegal on social media, because we pro-whites are extremely successful at convincing our fellow whites to reject anti-white globalist imperialism preached by anti-white ethnic Ashkenazi Jews via the electronic mass media.

– source: The Green Handshake; or, How Brother Gaddafi Smacked an Uppity British Prostitute Who Smacked Him Right Back

I’ll play Devil’s advocate and contest the part I emphasized, specifically that the new “moral system” is strictly anti-White.

White = BAD, Immigrant = GOOD.

White = BAD, Immigrant = GOOD.

I would agree that we are post-Christian, post-liberal and certainly post-progressive. Perhaps also post-capitalist, depending on how you define capitalism (a word never properly define IMO, not even by its jewish creator) – the entertainment and advertisement industries are growing exponentially, and thus the “trade” of capital is increasingly indirect, and often more complex that a two party exchange like was common a century ago.

But this modern form of post-capitalism has led to consumerism, and the combination of consumerism and lack of tribal identity – with social and sometimes even legal repression directed towards White racial fraternity – has led to the emergence of sub-cultures – what I called “sub-culturalism” a while back.

To be more specific, I would say that the lack of tribal identity has left a void that Whites are trying to fill with ideology: first religion, then politics, now consumer identity.

So in the political sphere alone, yes, the new “moral system” of the masses is whatever the jewish media says.

But in the social, cultural and sometimes economic fields, it’s a different story precisely because of sub-culturalism, and the ingroup / outgroup relationship is a bit different from the “White = Bad, Color = Good” that dominates the political debate.

Important to note: sub-culturalism = consumerism + lack of tribal identity. Blacks, Arabs and Asians can be “gamers”, but they can’t be Gamers – as in #Gamergate – because most would never trade their racial identities for something as ephemeral as consumer culture.

Likewise and more generally, there are many jewish homosexuals, even “LGBT” militants, and Black “feminists”, and Mestizo “environmentalists”, etc… but it’s pretty clear once you scratch a bit under the surface that these various causes are often just camouflage for identity politics – the cause conceals and sometimes complements, but never replaces, the underlying racial brotherhood. But a White person who defines himself as an “LGBT” advocate? That’s a different story.

Back to mercantile sub-culturalism.

Whether it’s because of Northern European “pathological altruism” – see the work of Kevin MacDonald – or because Whites are the most virulently targeted by multiculturalism’s craziest fanatics – ex. “is your baby racist?” – or a combination of both, Whites can and do trade their racial identity for a consumer identity, just as they once traded their racial identity for a religious identity, or a political identity, etc.

To summarize, I would agree with the quote in bold but only in the context of political partisanship.

In Politics

In politics, the White “moral system” becomes the race towards sentimental and hypocritical mock compassion – histrionic outrage at “offensive jokes” while bombing the Middle-East or crying for Mexican babies while turning a blind eye to Gaza – and telescopic charity towards refugees at the expense of, for example, urban homelessness, the synthetic opioid crisis, killers clowns, etc.

In doing so, new tribal identities are formed: the “us” – tolerant, compassionate, loving, etc. – vs the “them” – the hateful, the bigoted, the extremists, the Nazis.

Which brings us to the infamous concept of supremacy. The “us” is always superior to the “them”, and that pleases the members of the “us” while reaffirming the dogmas of individualism – they are part of the superior tribe X, and by choice at that, so they are doubly superior to the “sheep” that watch Fox News/CNN.

Something to note is that this system is very authoritarian in a “top-down” fashion, and there is very little room for divergence. You can’t be 75% “us”, as former-progressives getting swarmed by the Multikult for decade old emails can attest.

In Culture

In social, cultural and perhaps economic matters, the “White moral” system isn’t as simple as with politics.

Sub-culturalism dictates that the new tribal identities are formed organically, and completely artificially, around shared hobbies or interests. That, perhaps even more so than with politics, has the benefit of signalling the adherent’s individualism.

And as with politics, the subject gets to feel “superior” to outsiders – ex. gamers are “superior” to frat boys, fans of foreign films are “superior” to indiscriminate blockbuster viewers, vegans are of course “superior” to meat eaters, etc.

Where they differ – aside from the former being authoritarian/top-down and the latter being organic, quasi-anarchistic – is that since the social/sub-cultural groups aren’t political in nature, what constitutes their “us” isn’t necessarily related to the precepts of anti-White identity politics. And we all know the ladder tolerates no dissent (I can’t remember the blogger who came up with the term “convergence”).

For example, the “anime fan” sub-culture has tacit rules of what constitutes an “us” or ingroup, and a “them” or outgroup. But these rules aren’t likely to be political in nature, they’d probably be about appreciation of trend A, disdain for trend B, dress codes, jargon, etc. The result is one can be 1) a pro-White anime fan, 2) an anti-White anime fan, or 3) a TRUE anime fan who “doesn’t care about politics” – the latter having completely abandoned his racial identity and opted to define himself solely through his hobby.

The Hashtag-Gate

What happens when two of these groups clash? Hashtag-Gate.

You know: #Gamergate, #Metalgate, #Marvelgate, #FIFAgate, #Star(wars)gate, #Niggate, #IbrokeTaylorSwiftsgateswhenshewastwelve, etc.

Sub-culture A has its own rules and mores, and the mainstream (the multikult) comes in unilaterally demanding they do more for “minorities, people of color and immigrants” under the threat of creating a anti-racist scandal and slandering them as “nazis”.

Sure, the initial reaction by the members of targeted sub-culture will be some pointless “I have a Black friend” or “Dems R Real Raciss” circle-jerk, but once they start feeling the pressure of the multikult machine – not the most efficient monster, but what it lacks in efficacy it makes up for in relentlessness and impunity – they will grow resentful of anti-Whites.

From there, it’s very easy to covertly inoculate the unwary members of said sub-culture with pro-White talking points. How much better off would the pro-White movement be if #Gamergate, to name only the most consequential (for now) of the scandals, had been co-opted by the then emerging Alt-Right – or better, the Bob Whitaker / White Genocide Mantra crowd – rather than Breitbart, Fox News and the very worst of the CivNats (civic nationalism, particularly in such a racially diverse country as the USA, is another form of sub-culturalism).

Consumerism + Lack of tribal identity = Sub-culturalism
Sub-culturalism + Politics = X-gate conflict
X-gate conflict + pro-White talking points = Victory

Every new hashtag-gate, whether genuine or manufactured, is an opportunity to spread pro-White gospel. Culturally. That means outside of the political echo chamber (there was a study done a while back on conservative and liberal twitter users, and it was found that they almost never interacted with each other -> the definition of an echo chamber).

The Manufactured Crisis

I.e. how to create a Hashtag-gate.

I’ve written a lot about that in the past, but the short version is:

1) find something where a lot of White congregate (not necessarily physically)
2) call it racist
3) hint at “all White people are racist”, more or less overtly depending on the target audience
4) (optional) have someone else use pro-White talking points like “anti-racist is a code word for anti-White”
5) (optional) bomb Israel

Dassit. Example:

Taylor Swift fan: My daughters love Taylor Swift and I have to admit it’s the one CD that they have, that I love to play in the car. Taylor Swift is a very talented, and very sensible young lady, with a wonderful, positive message to young girls. Listen to the words of her song “Fifteen”. Those are words I want my girls to remember someday when they are fourteen and fifteen and are trying to figure their lives out!
COINTYRONEPRO #1: ^ Your white privilege is showing. What a surprise that you also like Taylor Shit, the embodiment of white privilege and institutional racism in America. You, and Taylor Shit, talk about being “fifteen” but do you know how many Minorities and People of Color are killed before reaching that age by racist police officers, white supremacist and the KKK? No, then I suggest you either shut up and LISTEN when Minorities are speaking, or simply kill yourself.
COINTYRONEPRO #2: Wow. Overreacting much? Someone mentions they like Taylor Swift and you tell them to kill themselves? For liking Taylor Swift? Or for being White? It seems that your ‘anti-racism’ is just ethnic bigotry towards White people. Are you perhaps Jewish? That would explain you being so neurotically anti-White, and so vulgar towards someone expressing his/her opinion in a cordial manner.
COINTYRONEPRO #1: (optional) Fuck off racist nazi, I shit on Palestine.

Rules for Genitals: it doesn’t need to be coherent as long as it is militant. See the comments of this thread.

White Supremacy is racist.

White Supremacy is racist.

The goals of this variation on the Tyrone Doctrine are two-fold: 1) to expose anti-Whites as the hateful neurotic authoritarians they are 2) to get pro-White talking points out of the political sphere and into the cultural realm, by any means necessary.

There’s little point in engaging some who calls himself “BaruchGoldsteinWasRight” and makes gulag and white phosphorus jokes. In fact, with all the partisanship, confirmation bias, paid provocateurs and drama surrounding the political scene, even the most well-crafted propaganda – i.e. Whitaker – will fall on deaf ears.

The tools are already there, all that’s needed is to start using them properly: culturally, not politically.

Back to hibernation.

Advertisements
🕐 Depacification #1: Principles 🕐

🕐 Depacification #1: Principles 🕐

Tyrone J. Trump, your God.

Tyrone J. Trump.

Niggas always asking me to expand on the concept of Multikult vs Subkult that I introduce previously, so here goes.

A four-part series on Tyrone’s Depacification Doctrine, starting with core principles.

The concept of Depacification can be explained as a three-step solution to the Multikult’s infestation of public consciousness.

1. Attack a Subkult (subculture) through the lens of multiculturalism/tolerance/diversity (= anti-Whiteness).
2. Provide the attacked with a pro-White verbal framework.
3. Insure that the pro-White framework is used in lieu of typical rebuttal to the points made by the accuser.

The goal is to have the members of the selected Subkult:

1. Turn on the Multikult through feeling attacked by it – achieved by (1).
2. Use the language of the Fourth Reich – achieved by (2).
3. Become conditioned to view the Multikult vs Subkult conflict, and all subsequent “anti-racism”, through a racial prism – achieved by (3).

There’s going to be a core set of principles in any Depacification campaign.

Since this series is about vulgarization, everything will be streamlined into the most condensed and accessible form possible.

We making dis shiet formulaic to the extreme nigga, we the McDonald’s of intellectual subversion.

Depacification Principles

As you might have noticed, these types of campaigns work best while controlling both (elements from) the attacking and defending parties. We’ll call the former “niggaz” and the latter “fams”.

Tyrone Trump, rule 63.

Tyrone Trump, rule 63.

Niggaz be like:

1. Identify a Subkult
2. Create a trigger
3. Attack via Multikult
4. Make Whiteness the focus
5. Downplay common rebuttals
6. Declare all Subkult guilty
7. Build anti-White rhetoric
8. Establish link with radicalism
9. Introduce the allegation of malice/intent
10. Follow with the accusation of hypocrisy
11. Personalize the attack

Fams be like:

1. Dramatize the scope of attacks
2. Mock the accusations
3. Typecast the accuser
4. Highlight anti-Whiteness
5. Counter-establish link with radicalism
6. Introduce JQ
7. Frame as attack against Whites
8. Anti-racist = Anti-White

Depacification Demonstration

Let’s use the case of #Metalgate to demonstrate the principles of Depacification.

First on the Niggaz side.

❗ Niggaz’ Offensive ❗

The best example I could find is also the one I used on the Multikult vs Subkult post. Not being very original in my research but it still demonstrates almost every principle.

Here’s the original: http://www.metalious.com/emperor/in-the-nightside-eclipse/racist.

1. Identify a Subkult

Pretty easy, as this was provided by anti-Whites themselves. Another example of the Fash being helped rather than hindered by anti-White hysteria.

Heavy metal music and the “metal community” were thus chosen a target of the Multikult’s wrath.

Anything too White is a prime target for Depacification.

2. Create a trigger

This is important as it gives both credibility to the offensive and the counter-offensive, where it could otherwise be dismissed as mere hysteria.

The trigger in this case are various racially intolerant comments made by some bands, and a few band names (“Zyklon-B”, etc). Doesn’t have to be very elaborate, as almost anything can justify being attacked as “racist”.

3. Attack via Multikult

The thesis is that the Subkult is guilty of wrong-think.

In our case, “metalheads” are guilty of racism, nazism, sexism, bigotry, homophobia, and worst of all “anti-semitism”.

If you consider Multikulturalism as a coalition of various subcultures, it’s akin to saying SubKult #671 is revoked from being “on the right side of history” (= part of the coalition) because wrong-think (= because racism = because White).

That’s the rationale behind saying “X has a Nazi/Racism/Bigot Problem that Needs to be Addressed”.

4. Make Whiteness the focus

At the end of the day, the goal of the offensive is to say “X is irredeemably bad because racist because White”.

But first, niggaz must blur the line between the Whiteness and the trigger (why the Subkult is attacked) so that the defendants have to simultaneously deal with the “legitimate” charges of “hate” and the more fanatical White = Racist leitmotiv.

This can be done in a number of ways, the most basic being the one used in our example – only its done in reverse order.

The author starts by attacking Whites as such “just look at who shows up to attend black metal concerts: all racist white males” and blends that accusation with the more alarming murder of a fag.

Depacification is, in many ways, just the interplay between anecdotal events and ethnic hate against White people.

Members of the Subkult get confused and don’t know how to defend against both simultaneous attacks.

5. Downplay common rebuttals

In the original Multikult vs Subkult post, I identify five categories of responses, one of which being “we’re not racist”/”Dems r REAL racists”, subsequently labelled D. Either for Dickless or because the others are A, B, C and E.

What needs to be avoided at all cost is: “sure, X has a problem with racism/nazism/bigotry, but it’s just like everything else, and it’s unfair to label the whole community for the actions of a few“.

Not only does it deflect the accusations, it also reinforces the Multikult narrative.

Anticipating this type of answer, as well as other factual rebuttals, is primordial.

One way to do it is to label any factual and/or logical response as an attempt to “minimize” hate/racism/nazism, and go on with Holocaust hysteria. Cucks are conditions to STFU during Holocaust hysteria so use that to your advantage.

In our example, the author mocks the “a few bad apples” trope and even accuses those promoting it of being crypto-nazis themselves. Why else would they minimize racism?

6. Declare all Subkult guilty

The trigger introduces a specific event that serves as a moral justification for the offensive, but alone it won’t do much unless it’s the entire Subkult that gets dragged into the conflict.

“Star Wars is racist” vs “Star Wars and its fans are racist”.

In our example, “as I’ve proven time and time again that all black metal bands are racist” subtly does the job. The point is reiterated at the end of the review.

7. Build anti-White rhetoric

Now that the confusion is at its climax around whether the attacks are against the cause of the trigger, the Subkult itself or White people in general, it’s time to hammer the anti-White rhetoric.

At its core, it boils down to White = racist and racist = White.

The rest is just adornment.

8. Establish link with radicalism

If something is White, it is racist. And if it’s racist, it’s also nazi, skinhead, and probably engaged in paramilitary terrorism like they show in Hollywood.

Dylann Roof may not have been influenced by Taylor Swift’s music, but he could have been.

Mostly for sensationalism, but it also serves a more insidious and subversive purpose.

The reason for these exaggerations is to demonstrate to the Subkult that to play the Multikult’s game while being White is to live with a sword of Damocles above one’s head.

No matter how much you adhere to its values, if you’re White you’re still only one step away from the “radical extremist nazis”.

9. Introduce the allegation of malice/intent

Not only are the members of the Subkult part of a racist community (in addition to being racist themselves), they are also engaged in a conspiracy to hide that nauseating racism from public scrutiny.

As Tyrone Rubio said, “they know exactly what they are doing”.

It’s not that Taylor Swift is a racist while her fans are dupes. Her fans know exactly what kind of 1488 monster she is, that’s why they like her.

Case in point, “The evidence proving the racism, fascism and anti-semitism of these bands is so obvious that the only possible reason for metal fans to overlook them is not ignorance but intentional malice“.

10. Follow with the accusation of hypocrisy

Always accuse the opponent of what you are doing.

Doing so moves the accusation away from “X is racist” towards “those who deny X is racist aren’t mistaken, they are hypocrites“.

This is important because it preemptively attacks those who would seek to deny the facts related to the trigger, and forces them to confront the less factual ones dealing with Whiteness.

It’s near impossible to claim “X didn’t say/mean/imply Y” without fulfilling the hypocritical fan stereotype.

11. Personalize the attack

The nail in the coffin, and mostly a technique to force the target away from rational thought and into tribal reaction.

Also implies the notion that only those who are Y would ever consent to being part of community X. There’s no other explanation that doesn’t reek of hypocrisy.

You listen to Emperor? That means YOU, personally, are a racist, sexist, homophobic, misogynist white supremacist“.

❗ Fams’ Defense ❗

The comments on the review posted above are pretty good, but the simplest and most concise example would be the following: https://newblackmetal.wordpress.com/2018/10/06/who-hates-black-metal/.

1. Dramatize the scope of attacks

A lot of people react in a tribal fashion when their subculture is attacked, but some don’t. Usually those not seriously involved with said subculture.

Dramatizing the scope and extent of the attacks against the Subkult is a way to widen the net even further, for those who managed to evade being hooked on the first harvest.

In the example, they were labelled “attacks against the entire metal genre” and linked to prior “terrorist acts at black metal concerts”.

2. Mock the accusations

The goal of the “defense” is obviously not to defend anything, but to manipulate the audience into using Fourth Reich language (White, anti-White, White Genocide, etc).

With that stated, it would appear suspicious for a response not to address any of the points made by the accusation.

Which is why it’s a good practice to start by mocking the attacks, implying they – and by extend, any accusation of “racism” – are unworthy of answer.

3. Typecast the accuser

To make the attack/response dynamic relevant not just to specific subcultures but to the larger White Genocide project, the accuser must be cast as a proponent of said genocide.

See the second paragraph.

4. Highlight anti-Whiteness

“They hate White people”, etc.

Bring the anti-Whiteness to consciousness.

5. Counter-establish link with radicalism

who literally advocates for the genocide of Palestinians, as well as the murder of ‘nazi’ black metal musicians“.

6. Introduce JQ

Self-explanatory, “a certain site run by two jews, including one openly zionist and anti-White specimen“.

7. Frame as attack against Whites

Reaffirm the attacks are directed towards Whites, as Whites, and not just against the Subkult or members thereof.

8. Anti-racist = Anti-White

The conclusion, which explains the attacks against the Subkult in context of anti-White politics.

As always, dicks out.

🎃 Tyrone’s Depacification 🎃

🎃 Tyrone’s Depacification 🎃

The White Genocide Party.

The White Genocide Party.

Y’all too obsessed with converting people to the Fash, forgetting the immortal words of Tyrone Woods “I hope they learn some things that will help their golf game grow“. That’s the most important message anyone can give to the Alt-Right, because honestly they suck at golf and that’s an embarrassment to the Fash itself.

The Democratic party is actively anti-White. Approximately 50% of the US population – including about 30% of Whites – vote Democrat. It doesn’t follow that 50% of the US population is actively anti-White.

They aren’t actively anti-White but they use the verbal framework of those who are, making them de facto anti-Whites.

That’s an important concept because the Alt-Right is too obsessed with converting “normies” to join their cult, and not nearly obsessed enough with turning them into our bitches useful idiots.

Read about controlling the language here.

So how is that realized?

Russia is racist.

Russia is racist.

Through Tyrone’s depacification.

“Normies” aren’t really pro-Multikult as much as they are pacified by modern society, we need to return to feudalism so we can have sex with trannies and farm animals, deus vulva, etc… other people have written more extensively about these subjects and how they relate to the Fash.

But they come to the wrong conclusions insofar as they refuse to play the hand they’re dealt, opting instead for a phantasmagorical return of monarchy/Hitler/Jesus/the Black-Eyed Peas.

Here’s my alternative.

Tyrone’s Depacification: attacking whatever makes “normies” pacified to the Multikult through the lens of the Multikult itself.

Credit where credit is due, #Gaymergate showed the way well before I even started blogging.

In theory, having an entire subculture built around “gaming” – a consumerist lifestyle, the ultimate capitulation to capitalo/individualist values – is great for the Multikult. But its adherents overextended themselves and started attacking gamers because “racism” and thus alienating them from the larger Multikult coalition.

The model can be repeated ad infinitum, use the Multikult’s own values to attack various Subkults (subcultures) to turn them into useful idiots. See the guide to Subkulturalism, probably the only worthwhile post I ever wrote for this blog.

The Failure of #Gaymergate

A few points worth repeating.

#Gaymergate never gained any traction because they failed to apply the Tyrone Doctrine.

1. They didn’t paint their opponents as radical extremists, merely “social justice warriors” – as opposed to anti-Whites.
2. They didn’t define themselves as something larger than the opposition, merely as “gamers” – as opposed to, you know, “White”.
3. They didn’t follow the A/B/C/E reaction that I detailed in the Subkult guide. In fact, they focused on the painfully ineffective D response which is the one that is intentionally omitted from the debate as it’s counterproductive.

These three errors come from lack of proper verbal framework, which is why the Tyrone has to step in to guide y’all fashy infidel peons to the light of Muhammad Tyrone Christ Buddha-Light.

The Success of #Metalgate

A more successful example would be the one I used on the Subkulturalism guide, where various metal bands were – and still are – attacked by jews/the Multikult as “racist”.

The similarities between the “anti-racist” metal hysteria and that of #Gaymergate, which happened a few years before these bands started being attacked by the usual/same suspects, has led to the emergence of the name #Metalgate, courtesy I believe of the Death Metal Underground site.

Where #Metalgate differs from #Gaymergate is that they were, in fact, quite successful in alienating “normies” from the Multikult, in ways #Gaymergate never was, not to mention with much less resources, media exposure and manpower.

Thermopylae vs anti-Wei campaigns of the Three Kingdoms.

#Metalgate did in fact apply some – not all – elements of the Tyrone Doctrine.

1. They immediately counter-attacked, and not just against the accusation but against those formulating it – counter accusing them of hate (not some abstract “social justice” ideology). Some kamikazes even broke the taboo and used the term “anti-White”.
2. A few were content with playing defense and being “metalheads”, but many define themselves and the target of the Multikult’s attacks as White. See this post where the author even uses the “implicitly White” concept – taken, I believe, from über-Führer Kevin MacDonald himself.
3. Some went even further and added a dimension of hypocrisy by questioning the double-standard between anti-White hysteria and the absolute silence of these “anti-racists” over the Palestinian genocide. See this post for a good sniping at zionism. Blogger ICAReviews called the Israelo-Palestinian conflict the thin-wedge of jewish anti-Whiteness for a good reason: mentioning it works.

These three points alone explain the difference of success between the two “scandals”, and two attempts at depacification – ironically launched by the Multikult itself rather than the Fash.

The Conclusion

#Gaymergate is universally seen as a crushing defeat in which gaymers only managed to ridicule themselves and look even more fringe than before the conflict, whereas #Metalgate – to the extend that it was mediatized – managed to inflict severe casualties upon the Multikult by going for the jugular: the Mantra (anti-racist = anti-White), the “jews hate White people” truism, and the Israelo-Palestinian double-standard of “anti-racists”.

Yeah but it only worked within the gamer/metal subculture, it won’t translate into anything on a larger political scale“.

Maybe, maybe not.

But the LANGUAGE and VERBAL FRAMEWORKS used: “White”, “anti-White”, “zionist”, “jew”, “European people” and their permutations – i.e. “jewish terrorists” or “anti-White radical extremists” – will stay within public consciousness.

All in the name of depacification.

As always, dicks out.

🥝 (In)Glory(ous) Pigeonhole 88 🥝

🥝 (In)Glory(ous) Pigeonhole 88 🥝

Tyrone is a Big Nigger. If you mock my fash, you taste the BBC.

Tyrone is a Big Nigger. If you mock my fash, you taste the BBC.

Decompartmentalization = Wakanda + niggers + chill + Hitler.

Everyone talks about implicit vs explicit Whiteness.

But no one talks about the more important dichotomy, implicit vs explicit anti-Whiteness.

Anti-whiteness can only remain implicit – thus acceptable – by the process of compartmentalization.

It’s not that we hate White people, it’s those Racist/KKK/Republican/Christian/Redneck/Wrongthink nazis.

You can find equivalent fallacious distinctions with others forms of “anti-X” schemes.

  • Blacks vs Ghetto nigs
  • Fags vs LGBT militants
  • Liberals vs SJWs
  • Muslims vs Tuurhrists
  • Immigrants vs Illegals
  • White vs ‘Racist’
  • Pedophiles vs Tyrone
Tyrone's BBC besieged by ur mom. Don't mad.

Tyrone’s BBC besieged by ur mom. Don’t mad.

What makes it fallacious is that attacks on the more extreme latter groups are very often thinly veiled hits against the former.

Thus the saying: “Anti-racist is a code word for anti-White“.

So how do we weaponize this concept for God, Country and the Fash?

As stated in the Controlling the Language post and elsewhere on this blog, one must first simplify the Fash to reach the turrorism prone feeble-minded.

Decompartimentalization / Reverse Pigeonholing.

Take any indirect condemnation of Whiteness and replace any specific mention of implicit White identity with… explicit Whiteness.

Dat shiet isn’t hard to find, just copy and rewrite your favorite CNN shietpost.

White SJWs have a short shelf life. They get cannibalized by the very multiKult they champion. Perhaps one day they will learn that their “diversity” does not include them.

Example:

An Open Letter to Dying White Racists

NOTE: THIS ESSAY IS DIRECTED AT RACIST WHITE PEOPLE, NOT ALL WHITE PEOPLE.

I know, you think you’ve taken “your” country back with this election – and of course you have always thought it was yours for the taking, because that’s what you old racist bigots were bred to believe – but you are wrong.

It is math.

Not even advanced math. Just simple, basic, like 3rd grade math.

The kind of math that proves how your kind – mostly older white folks beholden to an absurd, inaccurate, nostalgic fantasy of what America used to be like – are dying.

Soon to be dead, in fact. And that’s good.

Racism is the cancer destroying Humanity.

Becomes:

An Open Letter to Dying White People

NOTE: THIS ESSAY IS DIRECTED AT ALL WHITE PEOPLE, DON’T YOU DARE SAY “BUT I’M PROGRESSIVE” OR “BUT I HAVE A BLACK FRIEND”.

I know, you think you’ve taken “your” communities back with your bullshit white privilege – and of course you have always thought it was yours for the taking, because that’s what you white supremacist nazis are bred to believe – but you are wrong.

It is math.

Not even advanced math. Just simple, basic, like 3rd grade math.

The kind of math that proves how your kind – white folks who believe that talking about “tolerance” is the same as practicing it – are a dying breed.

Soon to be dead, in fact. And that’s good.

Whiteness is the cancer destroying Humanity.

Anything either too meticulous or which could possibly be tied to a specific group/ideology/current/event is made as general as possible.

Fasces delenda est.

I’d say fuck racism, but we all know I mean fuck White people.

And that’s exactly what I’ll do, if by White people you mean specifically unde-

Dicks out.

❄️ Political Correctness vs Femdom of Speech ❄️

❄️ Political Correctness vs Femdom of Speech ❄️

BBQ Niggas.

BBQ Niggas.

A recurrent talking point of Alt-Lite pussies: “Femdumb of speech is threatened by political correctness, Dems wuz Kangz R Real Fascists“.

Maybe you remember when you were 6 years old and your cunt teacher cunt told you that “no one is asking you to get along with everyone, it’s okay to have difference but don’t be a bully“.

Similarly, the colorblind conservatives (they are all homosexual, I have the documents) will be found claiming crypto-cuckold imbecilic nonsense such as: “We all need to figure out a way to get along with each other and see past our differences“.

That’s pretty gay.

Moreover, that’s pretty dysfunctional and not a very European way of organization.

There’s no resolution.

Paul Ryan is not a model of Fash.

Paul Ryan’s daughter, Femdom of Speech Queen.

By definition, individuals that “have [significant] differences” with one another aren’t a group… they’re just a bunch of ♥D♥I♥V♥E♥R♥S♥E♥ individuals.

They never form a community.

A much more effective approach would be to identify the difference, determine whether they stem from personal disputes or collective incompatibilities and, if necessary, adjust either the entire group or one or the other involved parties. If necessary, segregate.

Anti-Whites were big about “muh femdumb of speech” starting with the (((New Left))) counterculture and up until that femdumb itself became a baggage rather than a tool of cultural subversion. Then it was promptly dropped for the more Orwellian – and more European? – “hate speech is not free speech“.

As many in the Alt-Right have undoubtedly realized, anti-Whites never believed in femdumb of speech. It was just a tool necessary in the 1960, whose obsolescence more than its fashiness is what made it a target for anti-Whites.

Adult entertainment.

Adult entertainment.

Is it ironic that the countries that most espoused femdumb of speech as a “Western value” – Anglosphere / Germany / Scandinavia – were the ones most easily domesticated by the (((New Left)))?

Contrast those with the more hard power inspired Eastern bloc, who never championed liberalism – whether classical or neo – and who are still, by all means of measurement, pretty fashy.

You know, the type of dudes that would have at least imprisoned Alissa “Ayn Rand” Rosenbaum and György “Soros” Schwartz instead of turning them into the ideological icons of both parties.

Tyrone’s new rule: Instead of attacking political correctness, rewrite political correctness.

PC = pro-White.

Anyone who is against our )))PC((( – or who defends anti-White “femdumb of speech“, same difference – is guilty of wrongthink.

The penalty is Paul Ryan.

Down syndrome is our strength.

Dicks out.