πŸ• Depacification #1: Principles πŸ•

πŸ• Depacification #1: Principles πŸ•

Tyrone J. Trump, your God.

Tyrone J. Trump.

Niggas always asking me to expand on the concept of Multikult vs Subkult that I introduce previously, so here goes.

A four-part series on Tyrone’s Depacification Doctrine, starting with core principles.

The concept of Depacification can be explained as a three-step solution to the Multikult’s infestation of public consciousness.

1. Attack a Subkult (subculture) through the lens of multiculturalism/tolerance/diversity (= anti-Whiteness).
2. Provide the attacked with a pro-White verbal framework.
3. Insure that the pro-White framework is used in lieu of typical rebuttal to the points made by the accuser.

The goal is to have the members of the selected Subkult:

1. Turn on the Multikult through feeling attacked by it – achieved by (1).
2. Use the language of the Fourth Reich – achieved by (2).
3. Become conditioned to view the Multikult vs Subkult conflict, and all subsequent “anti-racism”, through a racial prism – achieved by (3).

There’s going to be a core set of principles in any Depacification campaign.

Since this series is about vulgarization, everything will be streamlined into the most condensed and accessible form possible.

We making dis shiet formulaic to the extreme nigga, we the McDonald’s of intellectual subversion.

Depacification Principles

As you might have noticed, these types of campaigns work best while controlling both (elements from) the attacking and defending parties. We’ll call the former “niggaz” and the latter “fams”.

Tyrone Trump, rule 63.

Tyrone Trump, rule 63.

Niggaz be like:

1. Identify a Subkult
2. Create a trigger
3. Attack via Multikult
4. Make Whiteness the focus
5. Downplay common rebuttals
6. Declare all Subkult guilty
7. Build anti-White rhetoric
8. Establish link with radicalism
9. Introduce the allegation of malice/intent
10. Follow with the accusation of hypocrisy
11. Personalize the attack

Fams be like:

1. Dramatize the scope of attacks
2. Mock the accusations
3. Typecast the accuser
4. Highlight anti-Whiteness
5. Counter-establish link with radicalism
6. Introduce JQ
7. Frame as attack against Whites
8. Anti-racist = Anti-White

Depacification Demonstration

Let’s use the case of #Metalgate to demonstrate the principles of Depacification.

First on the Niggaz side.

❗ Niggaz’ Offensive ❗

The best example I could find is also the one I used on the Multikult vs Subkult post. Not being very original in my research but it still demonstrates almost every principle.

Here’s the original: http://www.metalious.com/emperor/in-the-nightside-eclipse/racist.

1. Identify a Subkult

Pretty easy, as this was provided by anti-Whites themselves. Another example of the Fash being helped rather than hindered by anti-White hysteria.

Heavy metal music and the “metal community” were thus chosen a target of the Multikult’s wrath.

Anything too White is a prime target for Depacification.

2. Create a trigger

This is important as it gives both credibility to the offensive and the counter-offensive, where it could otherwise be dismissed as mere hysteria.

The trigger in this case are various racially intolerant comments made by some bands, and a few band names (“Zyklon-B”, etc). Doesn’t have to be very elaborate, as almost anything can justify being attacked as “racist”.

3. Attack via Multikult

The thesis is that the Subkult is guilty of wrong-think.

In our case, “metalheads” are guilty of racism, nazism, sexism, bigotry, homophobia, and worst of all “anti-semitism”.

If you consider Multikulturalism as a coalition of various subcultures, it’s akin to saying SubKult #671 is revoked from being “on the right side of history” (= part of the coalition) because wrong-think (= because racism = because White).

That’s the rationale behind saying “X has a Nazi/Racism/Bigot Problem that Needs to be Addressed”.

4. Make Whiteness the focus

At the end of the day, the goal of the offensive is to say “X is irredeemably bad because racist because White”.

But first, niggaz must blur the line between the Whiteness and the trigger (why the Subkult is attacked) so that the defendants have to simultaneously deal with the “legitimate” charges of “hate” and the more fanatical White = Racist leitmotiv.

This can be done in a number of ways, the most basic being the one used in our example – only its done in reverse order.

The author starts by attacking Whites as such “just look at who shows up to attend black metal concerts: all racist white males” and blends that accusation with the more alarming murder of a fag.

Depacification is, in many ways, just the interplay between anecdotal events and ethnic hate against White people.

Members of the Subkult get confused and don’t know how to defend against both simultaneous attacks.

5. Downplay common rebuttals

In the original Multikult vs Subkult post, I identify five categories of responses, one of which being “we’re not racist”/”Dems r REAL racists”, subsequently labelled D. Either for Dickless or because the others are A, B, C and E.

What needs to be avoided at all cost is: “sure, X has a problem with racism/nazism/bigotry, but it’s just like everything else, and it’s unfair to label the whole community for the actions of a few“.

Not only does it deflect the accusations, it also reinforces the Multikult narrative.

Anticipating this type of answer, as well as other factual rebuttals, is primordial.

One way to do it is to label any factual and/or logical response as an attempt to “minimize” hate/racism/nazism, and go on with Holocaust hysteria. Cucks are conditions to STFU during Holocaust hysteria so use that to your advantage.

In our example, the author mocks the “a few bad apples” trope and even accuses those promoting it of being crypto-nazis themselves. Why else would they minimize racism?

6. Declare all Subkult guilty

The trigger introduces a specific event that serves as a moral justification for the offensive, but alone it won’t do much unless it’s the entire Subkult that gets dragged into the conflict.

“Star Wars is racist” vs “Star Wars and its fans are racist”.

In our example, “as I’ve proven time and time again that all black metal bands are racist” subtly does the job. The point is reiterated at the end of the review.

7. Build anti-White rhetoric

Now that the confusion is at its climax around whether the attacks are against the cause of the trigger, the Subkult itself or White people in general, it’s time to hammer the anti-White rhetoric.

At its core, it boils down to White = racist and racist = White.

The rest is just adornment.

8. Establish link with radicalism

If something is White, it is racist. And if it’s racist, it’s also nazi, skinhead, and probably engaged in paramilitary terrorism like they show in Hollywood.

Dylann Roof may not have been influenced by Taylor Swift’s music, but he could have been.

Mostly for sensationalism, but it also serves a more insidious and subversive purpose.

The reason for these exaggerations is to demonstrate to the Subkult that to play the Multikult’s game while being White is to live with a sword of Damocles above one’s head.

No matter how much you adhere to its values, if you’re White you’re still only one step away from the “radical extremist nazis”.

9. Introduce the allegation of malice/intent

Not only are the members of the Subkult part of a racist community (in addition to being racist themselves), they are also engaged in a conspiracy to hide that nauseating racism from public scrutiny.

As Tyrone Rubio said, “they know exactly what they are doing”.

It’s not that Taylor Swift is a racist while her fans are dupes. Her fans know exactly what kind of 1488 monster she is, that’s why they like her.

Case in point, “The evidence proving the racism, fascism and anti-semitism of these bands is so obvious that the only possible reason for metal fans to overlook them is not ignorance but intentional malice“.

10. Follow with the accusation of hypocrisy

Always accuse the opponent of what you are doing.

Doing so moves the accusation away from “X is racist” towards “those who deny X is racist aren’t mistaken, they are hypocrites“.

This is important because it preemptively attacks those who would seek to deny the facts related to the trigger, and forces them to confront the less factual ones dealing with Whiteness.

It’s near impossible to claim “X didn’t say/mean/imply Y” without fulfilling the hypocritical fan stereotype.

11. Personalize the attack

The nail in the coffin, and mostly a technique to force the target away from rational thought and into tribal reaction.

Also implies the notion that only those who are Y would ever consent to being part of community X. There’s no other explanation that doesn’t reek of hypocrisy.

You listen to Emperor? That means YOU, personally, are a racist, sexist, homophobic, misogynist white supremacist“.

❗ Fams’ Defense ❗

The comments on the review posted above are pretty good, but the simplest and most concise example would be the following: https://newblackmetal.wordpress.com/2018/10/06/who-hates-black-metal/.

1. Dramatize the scope of attacks

A lot of people react in a tribal fashion when their subculture is attacked, but some don’t. Usually those not seriously involved with said subculture.

Dramatizing the scope and extent of the attacks against the Subkult is a way to widen the net even further, for those who managed to evade being hooked on the first harvest.

In the example, they were labelled “attacks against the entire metal genre” and linked to prior “terrorist acts at black metal concerts”.

2. Mock the accusations

The goal of the “defense” is obviously not to defend anything, but to manipulate the audience into using Fourth Reich language (White, anti-White, White Genocide, etc).

With that stated, it would appear suspicious for a response not to address any of the points made by the accusation.

Which is why it’s a good practice to start by mocking the attacks, implying they – and by extend, any accusation of “racism” – are unworthy of answer.

3. Typecast the accuser

To make the attack/response dynamic relevant not just to specific subcultures but to the larger White Genocide project, the accuser must be cast as a proponent of said genocide.

See the second paragraph.

4. Highlight anti-Whiteness

“They hate White people”, etc.

Bring the anti-Whiteness to consciousness.

5. Counter-establish link with radicalism

who literally advocates for the genocide of Palestinians, as well as the murder of β€˜nazi’ black metal musicians“.

6. Introduce JQ

Self-explanatory, “a certain site run by two jews, including one openly zionist and anti-White specimen“.

7. Frame as attack against Whites

Reaffirm the attacks are directed towards Whites, as Whites, and not just against the Subkult or members thereof.

8. Anti-racist = Anti-White

The conclusion, which explains the attacks against the Subkult in context of anti-White politics.

As always, dicks out.

Advertisements
πŸŽƒ Tyrone’s Depacification πŸŽƒ

πŸŽƒ Tyrone’s Depacification πŸŽƒ

The White Genocide Party.

The White Genocide Party.

Y’all too obsessed with converting people to the Fash, forgetting the immortal words of Tyrone Woods “I hope they learn some things that will help their golf game grow“. That’s the most important message anyone can give to the Alt-Right, because honestly they suck at golf and that’s an embarrassment to the Fash itself.

The Democratic party is actively anti-White. Approximately 50% of the US population – including about 30% of Whites – vote Democrat. It doesn’t follow that 50% of the US population is actively anti-White.

They aren’t actively anti-White but they use the verbal framework of those who are, making them de facto anti-Whites.

That’s an important concept because the Alt-Right is too obsessed with converting “normies” to join their cult, and not nearly obsessed enough with turning them into our bitches useful idiots.

Read about controlling the language here.

So how is that realized?

Russia is racist.

Russia is racist.

Through Tyrone’s depacification.

“Normies” aren’t really pro-Multikult as much as they are pacified by modern society, we need to return to feudalism so we can have sex with trannies and farm animals, deus vulva, etc… other people have written more extensively about these subjects and how they relate to the Fash.

But they come to the wrong conclusions insofar as they refuse to play the hand they’re dealt, opting instead for a phantasmagorical return of monarchy/Hitler/Jesus/the Black-Eyed Peas.

Here’s my alternative.

Tyrone’s Depacification: attacking whatever makes “normies” pacified to the Multikult through the lens of the Multikult itself.

Credit where credit is due, #Gaymergate showed the way well before I even started blogging.

In theory, having an entire subculture built around “gaming” – a consumerist lifestyle, the ultimate capitulation to capitalo/individualist values – is great for the Multikult. But its adherents overextended themselves and started attacking gamers because “racism” and thus alienating them from the larger Multikult coalition.

The model can be repeated ad infinitum, use the Multikult’s own values to attack various Subkults (subcultures) to turn them into useful idiots. See the guide to Subkulturalism, probably the only worthwhile post I ever wrote for this blog.

The Failure of #Gaymergate

A few points worth repeating.

#Gaymergate never gained any traction because they failed to apply the Tyrone Doctrine.

1. They didn’t paint their opponents as radical extremists, merely “social justice warriors” – as opposed to anti-Whites.
2. They didn’t define themselves as something larger than the opposition, merely as “gamers” – as opposed to, you know, “White”.
3. They didn’t follow the A/B/C/E reaction that I detailed in the Subkult guide. In fact, they focused on the painfully ineffective D response which is the one that is intentionally omitted from the debate as it’s counterproductive.

These three errors come from lack of proper verbal framework, which is why the Tyrone has to step in to guide y’all fashy infidel peons to the light of Muhammad Tyrone Christ Buddha-Light.

The Success of #Metalgate

A more successful example would be the one I used on the Subkulturalism guide, where various metal bands were – and still are – attacked by jews/the Multikult as “racist”.

The similarities between the “anti-racist” metal hysteria and that of #Gaymergate, which happened a few years before these bands started being attacked by the usual/same suspects, has led to the emergence of the name #Metalgate, courtesy I believe of the Death Metal Underground site.

Where #Metalgate differs from #Gaymergate is that they were, in fact, quite successful in alienating “normies” from the Multikult, in ways #Gaymergate never was, not to mention with much less resources, media exposure and manpower.

Thermopylae vs anti-Wei campaigns of the Three Kingdoms.

#Metalgate did in fact apply some – not all – elements of the Tyrone Doctrine.

1. They immediately counter-attacked, and not just against the accusation but against those formulating it – counter accusing them of hate (not some abstract “social justice” ideology). Some kamikazes even broke the taboo and used the term “anti-White”.
2. A few were content with playing defense and being “metalheads”, but many define themselves and the target of the Multikult’s attacks as White. See this post where the author even uses the “implicitly White” concept – taken, I believe, from ΓΌber-FΓΌhrer Kevin MacDonald himself.
3. Some went even further and added a dimension of hypocrisy by questioning the double-standard between anti-White hysteria and the absolute silence of these “anti-racists” over the Palestinian genocide. See this post for a good sniping at zionism. Blogger ICAReviews called the Israelo-Palestinian conflict the thin-wedge of jewish anti-Whiteness for a good reason: mentioning it works.

These three points alone explain the difference of success between the two “scandals”, and two attempts at depacification – ironically launched by the Multikult itself rather than the Fash.

The Conclusion

#Gaymergate is universally seen as a crushing defeat in which gaymers only managed to ridicule themselves and look even more fringe than before the conflict, whereas #Metalgate – to the extend that it was mediatized – managed to inflict severe casualties upon the Multikult by going for the jugular: the Mantra (anti-racist = anti-White), the “jews hate White people” truism, and the Israelo-Palestinian double-standard of “anti-racists”.

Yeah but it only worked within the gamer/metal subculture, it won’t translate into anything on a larger political scale“.

Maybe, maybe not.

But the LANGUAGE and VERBAL FRAMEWORKS used: “White”, “anti-White”, “zionist”, “jew”, “European people” and their permutations – i.e. “jewish terrorists” or “anti-White radical extremists” – will stay within public consciousness.

All in the name of depacification.

As always, dicks out.

πŸ₯ (In)Glory(ous) Pigeonhole 88 πŸ₯

πŸ₯ (In)Glory(ous) Pigeonhole 88 πŸ₯

Tyrone is a Big Nigger. If you mock my fash, you taste the BBC.

Tyrone is a Big Nigger. If you mock my fash, you taste the BBC.

Decompartmentalization = Wakanda + niggers + chill + Hitler.

Everyone talks about implicit vs explicit Whiteness.

But no one talks about the more important dichotomy, implicit vs explicit anti-Whiteness.

Anti-whiteness can only remain implicit – thus acceptable – by the process of compartmentalization.

It’s not that we hate White people, it’s those Racist/KKK/Republican/Christian/Redneck/Wrongthink nazis.

You can find equivalent fallacious distinctions with others forms of “anti-X” schemes.

  • Blacks vs Ghetto nigs
  • Fags vs LGBT militants
  • Liberals vs SJWs
  • Muslims vs Tuurhrists
  • Immigrants vs Illegals
  • White vs ‘Racist’
  • Pedophiles vs Tyrone
Tyrone's BBC besieged by ur mom. Don't mad.

Tyrone’s BBC besieged by ur mom. Don’t mad.

What makes it fallacious is that attacks on the more extreme latter groups are very often thinly veiled hits against the former.

Thus the saying: “Anti-racist is a code word for anti-White“.

So how do we weaponize this concept for God, Country and the Fash?

As stated in the Controlling the Language post and elsewhere on this blog, one must first simplify the Fash to reach the turrorism prone feeble-minded.

Decompartimentalization / Reverse Pigeonholing.

Take any indirect condemnation of Whiteness and replace any specific mention of implicit White identity with… explicit Whiteness.

Dat shiet isn’t hard to find, just copy and rewrite your favorite CNN shietpost.

White SJWs have a short shelf life. They get cannibalized by the very multiKult they champion. Perhaps one day they will learn that their “diversity” does not include them.

Example:

An Open Letter to Dying White Racists

NOTE: THIS ESSAY IS DIRECTED AT RACIST WHITE PEOPLE, NOT ALL WHITE PEOPLE.

I know, you think you’ve taken “your” country back with this election – and of course you have always thought it was yours for the taking, because that’s what you old racist bigots were bred to believe – but you are wrong.

It is math.

Not even advanced math. Just simple, basic, like 3rd grade math.

The kind of math that proves how your kind – mostly older white folks beholden to an absurd, inaccurate, nostalgic fantasy of what America used to be like – are dying.

Soon to be dead, in fact. And that’s good.

Racism is the cancer destroying Humanity.

Becomes:

An Open Letter to Dying White People

NOTE: THIS ESSAY IS DIRECTED AT ALL WHITE PEOPLE, DON’T YOU DARE SAY “BUT I’M PROGRESSIVE” OR “BUT I HAVE A BLACK FRIEND”.

I know, you think you’ve taken “your” communities back with your bullshit white privilege – and of course you have always thought it was yours for the taking, because that’s what you white supremacist nazis are bred to believe – but you are wrong.

It is math.

Not even advanced math. Just simple, basic, like 3rd grade math.

The kind of math that proves how your kind – white folks who believe that talking about “tolerance” is the same as practicing it – are a dying breed.

Soon to be dead, in fact. And that’s good.

Whiteness is the cancer destroying Humanity.

Anything either too meticulous or which could possibly be tied to a specific group/ideology/current/event is made as general as possible.

Fasces delenda est.

I’d say fuck racism, but we all know I mean fuck White people.

And that’s exactly what I’ll do, if by White people you mean specifically unde-

Dicks out.

❄️ Political Correctness vs Femdom of Speech β„️

❄️ Political Correctness vs Femdom of Speech β„️

BBQ Niggas.

BBQ Niggas.

A recurrent talking point of Alt-Lite pussies: “Femdumb of speech is threatened by political correctness, Dems wuz Kangz R Real Fascists“.

Maybe you remember when you were 6 years old and your cunt teacher cunt told you that “no one is asking you to get along with everyone, it’s okay to have difference but don’t be a bully“.

Similarly, the colorblind conservatives (they are all homosexual, I have the documents) will be found claiming crypto-cuckold imbecilic nonsense such as: “We all need to figure out a way to get along with each other and see past our differences“.

That’s pretty gay.

Moreover, that’s pretty dysfunctional and not a very European way of organization.

There’s no resolution.

Paul Ryan is not a model of Fash.

Paul Ryan’s daughter, Femdom of Speech Queen.

By definition, individuals that “have [significant] differences” with one another aren’t a group… they’re just a bunch of β™₯Dβ™₯Iβ™₯Vβ™₯Eβ™₯Rβ™₯Sβ™₯Eβ™₯ individuals.

They never form a community.

A much more effective approach would be to identify the difference, determine whether they stem from personal disputes or collective incompatibilities and, if necessary, adjust either the entire group or one or the other involved parties. If necessary, segregate.

Anti-Whites were big about “muh femdumb of speech” starting with the (((New Left))) counterculture and up until that femdumb itself became a baggage rather than a tool of cultural subversion. Then it was promptly dropped for the more Orwellian – and more European? – “hate speech is not free speech“.

As many in the Alt-Right have undoubtedly realized, anti-Whites never believed in femdumb of speech. It was just a tool necessary in the 1960, whose obsolescence more than its fashiness is what made it a target for anti-Whites.

Adult entertainment.

Adult entertainment.

Is it ironic that the countries that most espoused femdumb of speech as a “Western value” – Anglosphere / Germany / Scandinavia – were the ones most easily domesticated by the (((New Left)))?

Contrast those with the more hard power inspired Eastern bloc, who never championed liberalism – whether classical or neo – and who are still, by all means of measurement, pretty fashy.

You know, the type of dudes that would have at least imprisoned Alissa “Ayn Rand” Rosenbaum and GyΓΆrgy “Soros” Schwartz instead of turning them into the ideological icons of both parties.

Tyrone’s new rule: Instead of attacking political correctness, rewrite political correctness.

PC = pro-White.

Anyone who is against our )))PC((( – or who defends anti-White “femdumb of speech“, same difference – is guilty of wrongthink.

The penalty is Paul Ryan.

Down syndrome is our strength.

Dicks out.

🐲 Controlling the Language πŸ²

🐲 Controlling the Language πŸ²

Tyrone Trump, rule 63.

Tyrone Trump, rule 63.

Simplify the Fash.

Only through simplicity can one understand the brilliance of the Fourth Reich.

What is simple is complex and therefore worthy of Tyrone’s acknowledgment but only if said simplicity isn’t counterbalanced by degenerate psychological tropes such as “nuance”, “content” and “monogamy”.

The (Abridged) Tyrone Doctrine: Raising the social and professional costs of being anti-White while simultaneously lowering those of being pro-White.

If you’re a cunt and a nigger, you’re name is probably Latrisha.

But that’s a good thing because if you write Latrisha backwards it spells Ashley, and I’m sexual attracted to any girl with the name Ashley.

To any male too, probably.

F-F-For reasons that have nothing to do with National Socialism.

Tyrone J. Trump, your God.

Tyrone J. Trump, your God.

Black people (the superior race) follow the path of the fried chicken, but mere humans follow the path of least resistance through the hymen of Ashley the preteen cunt.

Though if she’s called Ashley, I’d still smash her even if she’s post-teen (what a disgusting word, I hope it never appears on this blog again).

Niggers.

Now is the time to take control of the narrative.

You must think with your dick before you rape with your mind” – Tyrone J. Trump.

As I said, humans follow the path of least resistance so all that’s needed is to provide the verbal framework for them to defend “their” positions in a way that benefits the Reich.

When attacked, most Whites will follow a predictable yet erratic pattern: dems r real racists, muh white iq, black crime, africans never built any civilization…

Idem for anti-Whites.

In the Radicalizing Subcultures post, I cover the five possible responses to the accusation of “X is Racist“.

2 are pro-White, 2 are anti-White, 1 is neutral which is why it’s removed.

The Life of Tyrone.

The Life of Tyrone.

The way to win is to exploit the reactionary tendency of the attacked by circumventing the default attack/analysis/response pattern via the injection of pre-formatted talking points and mantras, thus exploiting natural human intellectual laziness to shape the narrative constructed through open ideological conflict or consensus.

See https://antifa666.wordpress.com for many examples.

Remove the neutrals (those who seek to make it not about race), and provide the language for the pro-White and anti-White sides.

It’s much better for us if both sides use our language, our soundbites, our concepts, our logos, our arguments, our assumptions, our principles and our theses rather than to let them improvise and, worse case scenario, reach an unforeseen compromise that goes against the interests of the Reich.

My dick is big but I fuck with my dick” – Tyrone de Musset.

Stop being Pavlov’s dogs, and start being Pavlov’s Michael Vick (a Based Black Man if there ever was one).

"Muh Dik", 1934.

“Muh Dik”, 1934.

The only difference a cuckservative and a Neon Nazi is the mental map they use to oppose “the Left”.

The only difference between a progressive and an antifa is, likewise, the mental map they use to oppose “the Right”.

But that mental maps is born from a verbal framework, i.e. Language.

The ‘feels’ precede the thought.

The chimpout precedes the banana.

And they will only ever develop their own if they fail to find a satisfactory verbal framework through rhetorical mimicry.

To educate the young is not to familiarize them with their times, but to make them ignore them as long as possible” – NicolΓ‘s GΓ³mez DΓ‘vila.

Tyrone Tip: whenever I quote something without claiming kinship, pay attention.

Dicks out.