πŸ• Depacification #1: Principles πŸ•

πŸ• Depacification #1: Principles πŸ•

Tyrone J. Trump, your God.

Tyrone J. Trump.

Niggas always asking me to expand on the concept of Multikult vs Subkult that I introduce previously, so here goes.

A four-part series on Tyrone’s Depacification Doctrine, starting with core principles.

The concept of Depacification can be explained as a three-step solution to the Multikult’s infestation of public consciousness.

1. Attack a Subkult (subculture) through the lens of multiculturalism/tolerance/diversity (= anti-Whiteness).
2. Provide the attacked with a pro-White verbal framework.
3. Insure that the pro-White framework is used in lieu of typical rebuttal to the points made by the accuser.

The goal is to have the members of the selected Subkult:

1. Turn on the Multikult through feeling attacked by it – achieved by (1).
2. Use the language of the Fourth Reich – achieved by (2).
3. Become conditioned to view the Multikult vs Subkult conflict, and all subsequent “anti-racism”, through a racial prism – achieved by (3).

There’s going to be a core set of principles in any Depacification campaign.

Since this series is about vulgarization, everything will be streamlined into the most condensed and accessible form possible.

We making dis shiet formulaic to the extreme nigga, we the McDonald’s of intellectual subversion.

Depacification Principles

As you might have noticed, these types of campaigns work best while controlling both (elements from) the attacking and defending parties. We’ll call the former “niggaz” and the latter “fams”.

Tyrone Trump, rule 63.

Tyrone Trump, rule 63.

Niggaz be like:

1. Identify a Subkult
2. Create a trigger
3. Attack via Multikult
4. Make Whiteness the focus
5. Downplay common rebuttals
6. Declare all Subkult guilty
7. Build anti-White rhetoric
8. Establish link with radicalism
9. Introduce the allegation of malice/intent
10. Follow with the accusation of hypocrisy
11. Personalize the attack

Fams be like:

1. Dramatize the scope of attacks
2. Mock the accusations
3. Typecast the accuser
4. Highlight anti-Whiteness
5. Counter-establish link with radicalism
6. Introduce JQ
7. Frame as attack against Whites
8. Anti-racist = Anti-White

Depacification Demonstration

Let’s use the case of #Metalgate to demonstrate the principles of Depacification.

First on the Niggaz side.

❗ Niggaz’ Offensive ❗

The best example I could find is also the one I used on the Multikult vs Subkult post. Not being very original in my research but it still demonstrates almost every principle.

Here’s the original: http://www.metalious.com/emperor/in-the-nightside-eclipse/racist.

1. Identify a Subkult

Pretty easy, as this was provided by anti-Whites themselves. Another example of the Fash being helped rather than hindered by anti-White hysteria.

Heavy metal music and the “metal community” were thus chosen a target of the Multikult’s wrath.

Anything too White is a prime target for Depacification.

2. Create a trigger

This is important as it gives both credibility to the offensive and the counter-offensive, where it could otherwise be dismissed as mere hysteria.

The trigger in this case are various racially intolerant comments made by some bands, and a few band names (“Zyklon-B”, etc). Doesn’t have to be very elaborate, as almost anything can justify being attacked as “racist”.

3. Attack via Multikult

The thesis is that the Subkult is guilty of wrong-think.

In our case, “metalheads” are guilty of racism, nazism, sexism, bigotry, homophobia, and worst of all “anti-semitism”.

If you consider Multikulturalism as a coalition of various subcultures, it’s akin to saying SubKult #671 is revoked from being “on the right side of history” (= part of the coalition) because wrong-think (= because racism = because White).

That’s the rationale behind saying “X has a Nazi/Racism/Bigot Problem that Needs to be Addressed”.

4. Make Whiteness the focus

At the end of the day, the goal of the offensive is to say “X is irredeemably bad because racist because White”.

But first, niggaz must blur the line between the Whiteness and the trigger (why the Subkult is attacked) so that the defendants have to simultaneously deal with the “legitimate” charges of “hate” and the more fanatical White = Racist leitmotiv.

This can be done in a number of ways, the most basic being the one used in our example – only its done in reverse order.

The author starts by attacking Whites as such “just look at who shows up to attend black metal concerts: all racist white males” and blends that accusation with the more alarming murder of a fag.

Depacification is, in many ways, just the interplay between anecdotal events and ethnic hate against White people.

Members of the Subkult get confused and don’t know how to defend against both simultaneous attacks.

5. Downplay common rebuttals

In the original Multikult vs Subkult post, I identify five categories of responses, one of which being “we’re not racist”/”Dems r REAL racists”, subsequently labelled D. Either for Dickless or because the others are A, B, C and E.

What needs to be avoided at all cost is: “sure, X has a problem with racism/nazism/bigotry, but it’s just like everything else, and it’s unfair to label the whole community for the actions of a few“.

Not only does it deflect the accusations, it also reinforces the Multikult narrative.

Anticipating this type of answer, as well as other factual rebuttals, is primordial.

One way to do it is to label any factual and/or logical response as an attempt to “minimize” hate/racism/nazism, and go on with Holocaust hysteria. Cucks are conditions to STFU during Holocaust hysteria so use that to your advantage.

In our example, the author mocks the “a few bad apples” trope and even accuses those promoting it of being crypto-nazis themselves. Why else would they minimize racism?

6. Declare all Subkult guilty

The trigger introduces a specific event that serves as a moral justification for the offensive, but alone it won’t do much unless it’s the entire Subkult that gets dragged into the conflict.

“Star Wars is racist” vs “Star Wars and its fans are racist”.

In our example, “as I’ve proven time and time again that all black metal bands are racist” subtly does the job. The point is reiterated at the end of the review.

7. Build anti-White rhetoric

Now that the confusion is at its climax around whether the attacks are against the cause of the trigger, the Subkult itself or White people in general, it’s time to hammer the anti-White rhetoric.

At its core, it boils down to White = racist and racist = White.

The rest is just adornment.

8. Establish link with radicalism

If something is White, it is racist. And if it’s racist, it’s also nazi, skinhead, and probably engaged in paramilitary terrorism like they show in Hollywood.

Dylann Roof may not have been influenced by Taylor Swift’s music, but he could have been.

Mostly for sensationalism, but it also serves a more insidious and subversive purpose.

The reason for these exaggerations is to demonstrate to the Subkult that to play the Multikult’s game while being White is to live with a sword of Damocles above one’s head.

No matter how much you adhere to its values, if you’re White you’re still only one step away from the “radical extremist nazis”.

9. Introduce the allegation of malice/intent

Not only are the members of the Subkult part of a racist community (in addition to being racist themselves), they are also engaged in a conspiracy to hide that nauseating racism from public scrutiny.

As Tyrone Rubio said, “they know exactly what they are doing”.

It’s not that Taylor Swift is a racist while her fans are dupes. Her fans know exactly what kind of 1488 monster she is, that’s why they like her.

Case in point, “The evidence proving the racism, fascism and anti-semitism of these bands is so obvious that the only possible reason for metal fans to overlook them is not ignorance but intentional malice“.

10. Follow with the accusation of hypocrisy

Always accuse the opponent of what you are doing.

Doing so moves the accusation away from “X is racist” towards “those who deny X is racist aren’t mistaken, they are hypocrites“.

This is important because it preemptively attacks those who would seek to deny the facts related to the trigger, and forces them to confront the less factual ones dealing with Whiteness.

It’s near impossible to claim “X didn’t say/mean/imply Y” without fulfilling the hypocritical fan stereotype.

11. Personalize the attack

The nail in the coffin, and mostly a technique to force the target away from rational thought and into tribal reaction.

Also implies the notion that only those who are Y would ever consent to being part of community X. There’s no other explanation that doesn’t reek of hypocrisy.

You listen to Emperor? That means YOU, personally, are a racist, sexist, homophobic, misogynist white supremacist“.

❗ Fams’ Defense ❗

The comments on the review posted above are pretty good, but the simplest and most concise example would be the following: https://newblackmetal.wordpress.com/2018/10/06/who-hates-black-metal/.

1. Dramatize the scope of attacks

A lot of people react in a tribal fashion when their subculture is attacked, but some don’t. Usually those not seriously involved with said subculture.

Dramatizing the scope and extent of the attacks against the Subkult is a way to widen the net even further, for those who managed to evade being hooked on the first harvest.

In the example, they were labelled “attacks against the entire metal genre” and linked to prior “terrorist acts at black metal concerts”.

2. Mock the accusations

The goal of the “defense” is obviously not to defend anything, but to manipulate the audience into using Fourth Reich language (White, anti-White, White Genocide, etc).

With that stated, it would appear suspicious for a response not to address any of the points made by the accusation.

Which is why it’s a good practice to start by mocking the attacks, implying they – and by extend, any accusation of “racism” – are unworthy of answer.

3. Typecast the accuser

To make the attack/response dynamic relevant not just to specific subcultures but to the larger White Genocide project, the accuser must be cast as a proponent of said genocide.

See the second paragraph.

4. Highlight anti-Whiteness

“They hate White people”, etc.

Bring the anti-Whiteness to consciousness.

5. Counter-establish link with radicalism

who literally advocates for the genocide of Palestinians, as well as the murder of β€˜nazi’ black metal musicians“.

6. Introduce JQ

Self-explanatory, “a certain site run by two jews, including one openly zionist and anti-White specimen“.

7. Frame as attack against Whites

Reaffirm the attacks are directed towards Whites, as Whites, and not just against the Subkult or members thereof.

8. Anti-racist = Anti-White

The conclusion, which explains the attacks against the Subkult in context of anti-White politics.

As always, dicks out.

Advertisements
The Walking Dems

The Walking Dems

Tyrone J. Trump, your God.

Tyrone J. Trump, your God.

One lost, ten recovered” is an old epigram from medieval France which basically means that for every one item you lose, you can gain ten of equivalent or superior value.

It’s often applied to cunts for some obscure reason.

As I’m writing this, the smartest of the Democrats are looking for an excuse to drop the more extremist elements of their party (Ocasio Cortez, Maxine Waters, Tom Perez and other non-White histrions) without alienating their increasingly radicalized base.

Another adage from another Frenchman “Never interrupt an enemy while he’s making a mistake“.

So obviously the Alt-Lite, which may as well be called (((Alt-Lite))), and the remnants of the Alt-Right are now siding with the “moderate” anti-Whites, supposedly to “teach that sheboon Waters a lesson”.

The future of the fash.

“Based” Paul Ryan taking a stand against racist Islam.

If you didn’t balk at the concept of “moderate” anti-Whiteness, congratulations, you deserve to be associated with the (((Alt-Lite))) alongside Cernovich, Shapiro, Laura Loomer and Pamela Geller.

All of whom are jewish, and all of whom are “moderately” anti-White.

Excluding of providing an excuse for the exclusion of Waters and Cortez from mainstream politics is stupid, for reasons exposed in one of my first posts: The White Supremacy of the Future Will Call Themselves Anti-Racists.

Tyrone’s law: Anyone publicly attacking Waters and Cortez is anti-White. No exceptions.

There’s a very counter-productive tendency in Alt-Right groups which consists in wanting to show the other side who’s boss. Maybe you were “triggered” by some mystery meat Puerto Rican insulting you on live TV while extolling the genetic superiority of her mid-80 IQ brethren. If that’s the case, you’re being stupid. Stop what you’re doing and read the second adage – the Napoleon one – again.

Not all immigrants are bad, some are just borderline retarded.

Queen Fash, deal with it.

In addition to being stupid, I’d also point out that you’d be a hypocrite for getting upset over Waters/Cortez/Perez because the jew Bernard “Ben Yehuda” Sanders has said infinitely worse about White people during his campaign and you all kept your mouths shut because “muh anti-semitism“… which WAS the correct strategy, as Sanders’ prolonged campaign ended up fragmenting Clinton’s coalition.

Ocasio Cortez is just a low(er) IQ Barack Obama without the political connections.

Gay transition…

It has been known, and predicted, for a long time that the Democrats are losing the White vote.

Naturally, the Democratic Establishment, most of the mainstream media and the (((Alt-Lite))) is blaming this phenomenon on the “radical Left” (i.e. people like Cortez, Waters, Keith Ellison, etc.) via the #WalkAway meme.

They want the face of the Democratic Party to be Biden, Hillary or Warren.

We want it to be Cortez, Waters and hopefully someday Oprah Winfrey or the Black actress that played in Ghostbusters.

They want to blame #WalkAway on “radicals”, we want to blame it on moderates.

Luckily, while they are somewhat coordinated in their approach, they are also not very smart so hijacking the Democratic Party in the name of non-White fascism will be just as easy as co-opting the late GOP for the Fourth Reich.

The answer, as you may have guessed, lies in the first proverb.

Tyrone’s Project for a New Pan-American Century

(also called the Reverse Sailer Strategy)

If the 2016 campaign has taught us anything, it’s that we can’t rely on the white vote anymore. Not only are whites in the process of becoming a rightfully despised and politically isolated minority, they have also shown that they will always choose to protect their privileges over doing what right for our communities. It’s time to choose the future, it’s time to choose people of color.

🀣🀣🀣

The problem with [Moderate]’s campaign is that (s)he’s trying to be a Donald Trump-lite. But white people, as they have consistently showed us over the course of the last elections, will always prefer the original to the imitation. What we need isn’t another compromise with Trump/the GOP, what we need is a new vision for our party. At some point, “we are the future” has to be more than a slogan – it has to stand for something. It has to mean that we are willing to invest in minorities.

🀣🀣🀣

Everyone says that Donald Trump’s campaign has brought out the worst of the white vote… but that’s not true, it was always there. There’s nothing new about racist white people voting for Trump. They voted for Trump in the same way they voted for Romney, and McCain before that. Racist white people were as surprised as anyone when their candidate, Donald Trump, won the general election. What has changed is that people of color and minorities, the fastest growing demographic in the USA, no longer vote as enthusiastically or as consistently for our candidates. That is something [Moderate] has refused to address or even acknowledge, which is why (s)he will lose… and yet this election doesn’t have to be a 2016-part-II. [Radical] can bring out the minority vote as much, if not more, than Barack Obama could in 2008.

🀣🀣🀣

The problem with [Moderate]’s campaign is that it has no chance of winning against the emboldened Republicans. [Moderate] is focusing on a demographic we can’t win – white people – while ignoring the much more progressive, politically stable, not to mention expanding, demographic that we need to win – the minority vote.

🀣🀣🀣

Is [Moderate] a Donald Trump plant? The question deserves to be asked. The path to victory is pretty clear: appeal to disenfranchised minorities. And yet what is [Moderate] doing? Ignoring minorities while playing second fiddle to Donald Trump’s white populist base. The Democratic Party, snatching defeat from the jaws of victory since 2004.

🀣🀣🀣

What happens when you ignore the minority vote for the sake of “party unity”? Ask Al Gore. Ask John Kerry. Ask Hillary Clinton (twice). Ask [Moderate] in a few months, when (s)he loses to Donald Trump/[generic Republican] because (s)he followed the losing strategy of ignoring the minority vote while focusing on the lost cause of flyover country.

🀣🀣🀣

Why are we making the same mistakes over and over again? Even the other side knows better than that, and they showed it when they said NO to their moderate candidate (Jeb Bush) and voted for the radical one (Donald Trump). You can only fight fire with fire. It should be our turn to say NO to the fallacy of “moderation” and embrace our values, those of [Radical]’s campaign, but instead we continue down the same path that brought us Donald Trump. It’s a sad day for our party, and our country, if [Moderate] wins the primary/seat/election.

🀣🀣🀣

Simply put, a vote for [Moderate] is a vote for Trump. Not only are their positions virtually indistinguishable from one another, but [Moderate] is only popular among those who already vote for Trump… white people. And the reason (s)he is popular is because they KNOW that (s)he will lose to him, badly, like Hillary Clinton in 2016.

❄️ Political Correctness vs Femdom of Speech β„️

❄️ Political Correctness vs Femdom of Speech β„️

BBQ Niggas.

BBQ Niggas.

A recurrent talking point of Alt-Lite pussies: “Femdumb of speech is threatened by political correctness, Dems wuz Kangz R Real Fascists“.

Maybe you remember when you were 6 years old and your cunt teacher cunt told you that “no one is asking you to get along with everyone, it’s okay to have difference but don’t be a bully“.

Similarly, the colorblind conservatives (they are all homosexual, I have the documents) will be found claiming crypto-cuckold imbecilic nonsense such as: “We all need to figure out a way to get along with each other and see past our differences“.

That’s pretty gay.

Moreover, that’s pretty dysfunctional and not a very European way of organization.

There’s no resolution.

Paul Ryan is not a model of Fash.

Paul Ryan’s daughter, Femdom of Speech Queen.

By definition, individuals that “have [significant] differences” with one another aren’t a group… they’re just a bunch of β™₯Dβ™₯Iβ™₯Vβ™₯Eβ™₯Rβ™₯Sβ™₯Eβ™₯ individuals.

They never form a community.

A much more effective approach would be to identify the difference, determine whether they stem from personal disputes or collective incompatibilities and, if necessary, adjust either the entire group or one or the other involved parties. If necessary, segregate.

Anti-Whites were big about “muh femdumb of speech” starting with the (((New Left))) counterculture and up until that femdumb itself became a baggage rather than a tool of cultural subversion. Then it was promptly dropped for the more Orwellian – and more European? – “hate speech is not free speech“.

As many in the Alt-Right have undoubtedly realized, anti-Whites never believed in femdumb of speech. It was just a tool necessary in the 1960, whose obsolescence more than its fashiness is what made it a target for anti-Whites.

Adult entertainment.

Adult entertainment.

Is it ironic that the countries that most espoused femdumb of speech as a “Western value” – Anglosphere / Germany / Scandinavia – were the ones most easily domesticated by the (((New Left)))?

Contrast those with the more hard power inspired Eastern bloc, who never championed liberalism – whether classical or neo – and who are still, by all means of measurement, pretty fashy.

You know, the type of dudes that would have at least imprisoned Alissa “Ayn Rand” Rosenbaum and GyΓΆrgy “Soros” Schwartz instead of turning them into the ideological icons of both parties.

Tyrone’s new rule: Instead of attacking political correctness, rewrite political correctness.

PC = pro-White.

Anyone who is against our )))PC((( – or who defends anti-White “femdumb of speech“, same difference – is guilty of wrongthink.

The penalty is Paul Ryan.

Down syndrome is our strength.

Dicks out.

🐲 Controlling the Language πŸ²

🐲 Controlling the Language πŸ²

Tyrone Trump, rule 63.

Tyrone Trump, rule 63.

Simplify the Fash.

Only through simplicity can one understand the brilliance of the Fourth Reich.

What is simple is complex and therefore worthy of Tyrone’s acknowledgment but only if said simplicity isn’t counterbalanced by degenerate psychological tropes such as “nuance”, “content” and “monogamy”.

The (Abridged) Tyrone Doctrine: Raising the social and professional costs of being anti-White while simultaneously lowering those of being pro-White.

If you’re a cunt and a nigger, you’re name is probably Latrisha.

But that’s a good thing because if you write Latrisha backwards it spells Ashley, and I’m sexual attracted to any girl with the name Ashley.

To any male too, probably.

F-F-For reasons that have nothing to do with National Socialism.

Tyrone J. Trump, your God.

Tyrone J. Trump, your God.

Black people (the superior race) follow the path of the fried chicken, but mere humans follow the path of least resistance through the hymen of Ashley the preteen cunt.

Though if she’s called Ashley, I’d still smash her even if she’s post-teen (what a disgusting word, I hope it never appears on this blog again).

Niggers.

Now is the time to take control of the narrative.

You must think with your dick before you rape with your mind” – Tyrone J. Trump.

As I said, humans follow the path of least resistance so all that’s needed is to provide the verbal framework for them to defend “their” positions in a way that benefits the Reich.

When attacked, most Whites will follow a predictable yet erratic pattern: dems r real racists, muh white iq, black crime, africans never built any civilization…

Idem for anti-Whites.

In the Radicalizing Subcultures post, I cover the five possible responses to the accusation of “X is Racist“.

2 are pro-White, 2 are anti-White, 1 is neutral which is why it’s removed.

The Life of Tyrone.

The Life of Tyrone.

The way to win is to exploit the reactionary tendency of the attacked by circumventing the default attack/analysis/response pattern via the injection of pre-formatted talking points and mantras, thus exploiting natural human intellectual laziness to shape the narrative constructed through open ideological conflict or consensus.

See https://antifa666.wordpress.com for many examples.

Remove the neutrals (those who seek to make it not about race), and provide the language for the pro-White and anti-White sides.

It’s much better for us if both sides use our language, our soundbites, our concepts, our logos, our arguments, our assumptions, our principles and our theses rather than to let them improvise and, worse case scenario, reach an unforeseen compromise that goes against the interests of the Reich.

My dick is big but I fuck with my dick” – Tyrone de Musset.

Stop being Pavlov’s dogs, and start being Pavlov’s Michael Vick (a Based Black Man if there ever was one).

"Muh Dik", 1934.

“Muh Dik”, 1934.

The only difference a cuckservative and a Neon Nazi is the mental map they use to oppose “the Left”.

The only difference between a progressive and an antifa is, likewise, the mental map they use to oppose “the Right”.

But that mental maps is born from a verbal framework, i.e. Language.

The ‘feels’ precede the thought.

The chimpout precedes the banana.

And they will only ever develop their own if they fail to find a satisfactory verbal framework through rhetorical mimicry.

To educate the young is not to familiarize them with their times, but to make them ignore them as long as possible” – NicolΓ‘s GΓ³mez DΓ‘vila.

Tyrone Tip: whenever I quote something without claiming kinship, pay attention.

Dicks out.

πŸ‰ Tyrone’s Ghetto πŸ‰

πŸ‰ Tyrone’s Ghetto πŸ‰

The White Genocide Party.

The White Genocide Party.

Africa = HIV + Animism.

Alt-Right = Africa + Privilege.

Many in the Alt-Right want to be part of a “movement”, read some Internet and/or real life syndicate with goals, codes, a structure and hierarchy.

That’s good.

They also want it visible, rigid and OFFICIAL.

That’s gay.

Colin Liddel, an ex-Spencer associate who has since then become a rather ardent critic of the golden sh- boy accused Andrew Anglin of attempting to marginalize the Alt-Right into a (((Hollywood Nazi))) ghetto.

I would take the statement further and claim that any effort to overtly define ourselves is a de facto ghettoization, albeit much less severe than the GTKRWN abrasive diarrhea of the h4Rdc0r3 Peter Panzer crowd.

The power of the SJW cult is that they DON’T openly declare their aims and affiliations.

Taylor Swift proves she isn't racist.

Taylor Swift proves she isn’t racist.

All political speech is ghetto, because – particularly in modern Weimarica – all political speech is partisan, and all partisanship triggers psychological blocks.

CNN is, to the average “normie”, just another news channel.

Their propagandists don’t brag about being part of a network owned and operated by an anti-White radical and ultra-zionist jew (Jeff Zucker).

The average HuffPo cunt who writes about the horrors of deporting illegal aliens doesn’t admit that she hates White people because she’s fat and asian and most AIDS-ridden NYC crackhead hobbos have dumped her to have sex with Jamal Hussein Khan the amazing Bangladeshi trap.

SJW anti-Whiteness isn’t just a political platform, in fact its stricto sensu political scope is rather limited. It’s a cultural mindset foremost, one that unfortunately transcends political ghettos.

White Feminism, Fourth Reich Propaganda.

White Feminism, Fourth Reich Propaganda.

As Tyrone Jun-Fan said: “Be formless, shapeless – like water“.

So as of today, I officially disavow all forms of discernible and categorizable political activism, movements, groups, associations and parties – with the exception of the White Genocide Party, doing God’s work by eliminating White racists/people – and instead inaugurate Tyrone’s ghetto.

Tyrone’s ghetto is a ghetto.

For Africans.

In Africa.

But unfortunately, as with all things from Africa… it doesn’t stay in Africa.

Tyrone’s ghetto combines the White man’s insalubrious Internet autism, the Black man’s subhuman libido, the Arab man’s religious moral indignation over theological dissent and pathological denial of transgression, and the Asian man’s, huh… whatever.

And of course, the point is that no one will ever admit to being part of Tyrone’s ghetto.

Because to admit to being part of Tyrone’s ghetto is to disprove the existence of Tyrone’s ghetto.

Also, the shame of conceding your lust for the Big Black Pole.

Accept Tyrone’s ghetto in your heart and the truth will set you free.

Tyrone’s ghetto is everywhere and nowhere, Tyrone’s ghetto exists as the invisible vessel of White supremacy, Tyrone’s ghetto is self-actualized Afro-consciousness in the age of the soy latte.

Tyrone’s ghetto conquers the battlefield of sixth-generation warfare with ideological flying pyramids.

Nothing can stand in the way of Tyrone’s ghetto, because all that stands must eventually sit.

We wuz kangz.

Dicks out.