๐Ÿ• Depacification #1: Principles ๐Ÿ•

๐Ÿ• Depacification #1: Principles ๐Ÿ•

Tyrone J. Trump, your God.

Tyrone J. Trump.

Niggas always asking me to expand on the concept of Multikult vs Subkult that I introduce previously, so here goes.

A four-part series on Tyrone’s Depacification Doctrine, starting with core principles.

The concept of Depacification can be explained as a three-step solution to the Multikult’s infestation of public consciousness.

1. Attack a Subkult (subculture) through the lens of multiculturalism/tolerance/diversity (= anti-Whiteness).
2. Provide the attacked with a pro-White verbal framework.
3. Insure that the pro-White framework is used in lieu of typical rebuttal to the points made by the accuser.

The goal is to have the members of the selected Subkult:

1. Turn on the Multikult through feeling attacked by it – achieved by (1).
2. Use the language of the Fourth Reich – achieved by (2).
3. Become conditioned to view the Multikult vs Subkult conflict, and all subsequent “anti-racism”, through a racial prism – achieved by (3).

There’s going to be a core set of principles in any Depacification campaign.

Since this series is about vulgarization, everything will be streamlined into the most condensed and accessible form possible.

We making dis shiet formulaic to the extreme nigga, we the McDonald’s of intellectual subversion.

Depacification Principles

As you might have noticed, these types of campaigns work best while controlling both (elements from) the attacking and defending parties. We’ll call the former “niggaz” and the latter “fams”.

Tyrone Trump, rule 63.

Tyrone Trump, rule 63.

Niggaz be like:

1. Identify a Subkult
2. Create a trigger
3. Attack via Multikult
4. Make Whiteness the focus
5. Downplay common rebuttals
6. Declare all Subkult guilty
7. Build anti-White rhetoric
8. Establish link with radicalism
9. Introduce the allegation of malice/intent
10. Follow with the accusation of hypocrisy
11. Personalize the attack

Fams be like:

1. Dramatize the scope of attacks
2. Mock the accusations
3. Typecast the accuser
4. Highlight anti-Whiteness
5. Counter-establish link with radicalism
6. Introduce JQ
7. Frame as attack against Whites
8. Anti-racist = Anti-White

Depacification Demonstration

Let’s use the case of #Metalgate to demonstrate the principles of Depacification.

First on the Niggaz side.

โ— Niggaz’ Offensive โ—

The best example I could find is also the one I used on the Multikult vs Subkult post. Not being very original in my research but it still demonstrates almost every principle.

Here’s the original: http://www.metalious.com/emperor/in-the-nightside-eclipse/racist.

1. Identify a Subkult

Pretty easy, as this was provided by anti-Whites themselves. Another example of the Fash being helped rather than hindered by anti-White hysteria.

Heavy metal music and the “metal community” were thus chosen a target of the Multikult’s wrath.

Anything too White is a prime target for Depacification.

2. Create a trigger

This is important as it gives both credibility to the offensive and the counter-offensive, where it could otherwise be dismissed as mere hysteria.

The trigger in this case are various racially intolerant comments made by some bands, and a few band names (“Zyklon-B”, etc). Doesn’t have to be very elaborate, as almost anything can justify being attacked as “racist”.

3. Attack via Multikult

The thesis is that the Subkult is guilty of wrong-think.

In our case, “metalheads” are guilty of racism, nazism, sexism, bigotry, homophobia, and worst of all “anti-semitism”.

If you consider Multikulturalism as a coalition of various subcultures, it’s akin to saying SubKult #671 is revoked from being “on the right side of history” (= part of the coalition) because wrong-think (= because racism = because White).

That’s the rationale behind saying “X has a Nazi/Racism/Bigot Problem that Needs to be Addressed”.

4. Make Whiteness the focus

At the end of the day, the goal of the offensive is to say “X is irredeemably bad because racist because White”.

But first, niggaz must blur the line between the Whiteness and the trigger (why the Subkult is attacked) so that the defendants have to simultaneously deal with the “legitimate” charges of “hate” and the more fanatical White = Racist leitmotiv.

This can be done in a number of ways, the most basic being the one used in our example – only its done in reverse order.

The author starts by attacking Whites as such “just look at who shows up to attend black metal concerts: all racist white males” and blends that accusation with the more alarming murder of a fag.

Depacification is, in many ways, just the interplay between anecdotal events and ethnic hate against White people.

Members of the Subkult get confused and don’t know how to defend against both simultaneous attacks.

5. Downplay common rebuttals

In the original Multikult vs Subkult post, I identify five categories of responses, one of which being “we’re not racist”/”Dems r REAL racists”, subsequently labelled D. Either for Dickless or because the others are A, B, C and E.

What needs to be avoided at all cost is: “sure, X has a problem with racism/nazism/bigotry, but it’s just like everything else, and it’s unfair to label the whole community for the actions of a few“.

Not only does it deflect the accusations, it also reinforces the Multikult narrative.

Anticipating this type of answer, as well as other factual rebuttals, is primordial.

One way to do it is to label any factual and/or logical response as an attempt to “minimize” hate/racism/nazism, and go on with Holocaust hysteria. Cucks are conditions to STFU during Holocaust hysteria so use that to your advantage.

In our example, the author mocks the “a few bad apples” trope and even accuses those promoting it of being crypto-nazis themselves. Why else would they minimize racism?

6. Declare all Subkult guilty

The trigger introduces a specific event that serves as a moral justification for the offensive, but alone it won’t do much unless it’s the entire Subkult that gets dragged into the conflict.

“Star Wars is racist” vs “Star Wars and its fans are racist”.

In our example, “as I’ve proven time and time again that all black metal bands are racist” subtly does the job. The point is reiterated at the end of the review.

7. Build anti-White rhetoric

Now that the confusion is at its climax around whether the attacks are against the cause of the trigger, the Subkult itself or White people in general, it’s time to hammer the anti-White rhetoric.

At its core, it boils down to White = racist and racist = White.

The rest is just adornment.

8. Establish link with radicalism

If something is White, it is racist. And if it’s racist, it’s also nazi, skinhead, and probably engaged in paramilitary terrorism like they show in Hollywood.

Dylann Roof may not have been influenced by Taylor Swift’s music, but he could have been.

Mostly for sensationalism, but it also serves a more insidious and subversive purpose.

The reason for these exaggerations is to demonstrate to the Subkult that to play the Multikult’s game while being White is to live with a sword of Damocles above one’s head.

No matter how much you adhere to its values, if you’re White you’re still only one step away from the “radical extremist nazis”.

9. Introduce the allegation of malice/intent

Not only are the members of the Subkult part of a racist community (in addition to being racist themselves), they are also engaged in a conspiracy to hide that nauseating racism from public scrutiny.

As Tyrone Rubio said, “they know exactly what they are doing”.

It’s not that Taylor Swift is a racist while her fans are dupes. Her fans know exactly what kind of 1488 monster she is, that’s why they like her.

Case in point, “The evidence proving the racism, fascism and anti-semitism of these bands is so obvious that the only possible reason for metal fans to overlook them is not ignorance but intentional malice“.

10. Follow with the accusation of hypocrisy

Always accuse the opponent of what you are doing.

Doing so moves the accusation away from “X is racist” towards “those who deny X is racist aren’t mistaken, they are hypocrites“.

This is important because it preemptively attacks those who would seek to deny the facts related to the trigger, and forces them to confront the less factual ones dealing with Whiteness.

It’s near impossible to claim “X didn’t say/mean/imply Y” without fulfilling the hypocritical fan stereotype.

11. Personalize the attack

The nail in the coffin, and mostly a technique to force the target away from rational thought and into tribal reaction.

Also implies the notion that only those who are Y would ever consent to being part of community X. There’s no other explanation that doesn’t reek of hypocrisy.

You listen to Emperor? That means YOU, personally, are a racist, sexist, homophobic, misogynist white supremacist“.

โ— Fams’ Defense โ—

The comments on the review posted above are pretty good, but the simplest and most concise example would be the following: https://newblackmetal.wordpress.com/2018/10/06/who-hates-black-metal/.

1. Dramatize the scope of attacks

A lot of people react in a tribal fashion when their subculture is attacked, but some don’t. Usually those not seriously involved with said subculture.

Dramatizing the scope and extent of the attacks against the Subkult is a way to widen the net even further, for those who managed to evade being hooked on the first harvest.

In the example, they were labelled “attacks against the entire metal genre” and linked to prior “terrorist acts at black metal concerts”.

2. Mock the accusations

The goal of the “defense” is obviously not to defend anything, but to manipulate the audience into using Fourth Reich language (White, anti-White, White Genocide, etc).

With that stated, it would appear suspicious for a response not to address any of the points made by the accusation.

Which is why it’s a good practice to start by mocking the attacks, implying they – and by extend, any accusation of “racism” – are unworthy of answer.

3. Typecast the accuser

To make the attack/response dynamic relevant not just to specific subcultures but to the larger White Genocide project, the accuser must be cast as a proponent of said genocide.

See the second paragraph.

4. Highlight anti-Whiteness

“They hate White people”, etc.

Bring the anti-Whiteness to consciousness.

5. Counter-establish link with radicalism

who literally advocates for the genocide of Palestinians, as well as the murder of โ€˜naziโ€™ black metal musicians“.

6. Introduce JQ

Self-explanatory, “a certain site run by two jews, including one openly zionist and anti-White specimen“.

7. Frame as attack against Whites

Reaffirm the attacks are directed towards Whites, as Whites, and not just against the Subkult or members thereof.

8. Anti-racist = Anti-White

The conclusion, which explains the attacks against the Subkult in context of anti-White politics.

As always, dicks out.

Advertisements
๐Ÿ‰ Tyrone Republican ๐Ÿ‰

๐Ÿ‰ Tyrone Republican ๐Ÿ‰

Not all immigrants are bad, some are just borderline retarded.

Not all immigrants are bad, some are just borderline retarded.

DONALD TRUMP DEMOCRAT.

Some bitch axed me if I wuz kang a “Rockefeller Republican”. I told the cunt that I’m a big dick Republican n shiet.

It makes sense cuz democrats are the real racists, they want to keep me on the plantation and I often step on my dick while trying to pick cotton. Cuz it’s big lol. The dick not the cotton.

Everyone on the internets want to know if I’m red or blue.

Nigga, I’m purple #grapedrank n shiet.

I'm not your "bro". I beat Hitler at RapeLay.

I’m not your “bro”. I beat Hitler at RapeLay.

So anyway I was boning the cunt pictured left while completely intoxicated to the point of boning the cunt pictured left while com-fuck?

So I was having fried chicken + interracial anal beaner demolition + excited delirium due to child molestation, head trauma and PCP and I had a revelation.

Yakub is White.

It is the truth and it has set me free from the shackles of heteronormative speleology.

Anyway, we need a new term to attack moderate Democrats like Pelosi, Warren, Biden.

The anti-White equivalent of “cuck”.

Voter ID prevents Russian interference.

Voter ID prevents Russian interference.

Pelosi = Jeb, (Mystery Meat Goddess) Ocasio-Cortez = Trump.

Trump is also mystery meat but he went in too hard on E110 food coloring.

TYRONE’S NEW TERMINOLOGY

Something like “Donald Trump Democrats“.

It’s not enough to be a Democrat, you have to endorse White Genocide too.

“Moderate” anti-White = Donald Trump Democrat.

Fashy anti-White who talks about gulags and white privilege = the future.

Read: What is a “Donald Trump Democrat”?

Dicks out.

The Walking Dems

The Walking Dems

Tyrone J. Trump, your God.

Tyrone J. Trump, your God.

One lost, ten recovered” is an old epigram from medieval France which basically means that for every one item you lose, you can gain ten of equivalent or superior value.

It’s often applied to cunts for some obscure reason.

As I’m writing this, the smartest of the Democrats are looking for an excuse to drop the more extremist elements of their party (Ocasio Cortez, Maxine Waters, Tom Perez and other non-White histrions) without alienating their increasingly radicalized base.

Another adage from another Frenchman “Never interrupt an enemy while he’s making a mistake“.

So obviously the Alt-Lite, which may as well be called (((Alt-Lite))), and the remnants of the Alt-Right are now siding with the “moderate” anti-Whites, supposedly to “teach that sheboon Waters a lesson”.

The future of the fash.

“Based” Paul Ryan taking a stand against racist Islam.

If you didn’t balk at the concept of “moderate” anti-Whiteness, congratulations, you deserve to be associated with the (((Alt-Lite))) alongside Cernovich, Shapiro, Laura Loomer and Pamela Geller.

All of whom are jewish, and all of whom are “moderately” anti-White.

Excluding of providing an excuse for the exclusion of Waters and Cortez from mainstream politics is stupid, for reasons exposed in one of my first posts: The White Supremacy of the Future Will Call Themselves Anti-Racists.

Tyrone’s law: Anyone publicly attacking Waters and Cortez is anti-White. No exceptions.

There’s a very counter-productive tendency in Alt-Right groups which consists in wanting to show the other side who’s boss. Maybe you were “triggered” by some mystery meat Puerto Rican insulting you on live TV while extolling the genetic superiority of her mid-80 IQ brethren. If that’s the case, you’re being stupid. Stop what you’re doing and read the second adage – the Napoleon one – again.

Not all immigrants are bad, some are just borderline retarded.

Queen Fash, deal with it.

In addition to being stupid, I’d also point out that you’d be a hypocrite for getting upset over Waters/Cortez/Perez because the jew Bernard “Ben Yehuda” Sanders has said infinitely worse about White people during his campaign and you all kept your mouths shut because “muh anti-semitism“… which WAS the correct strategy, as Sanders’ prolonged campaign ended up fragmenting Clinton’s coalition.

Ocasio Cortez is just a low(er) IQ Barack Obama without the political connections.

Gay transition…

It has been known, and predicted, for a long time that the Democrats are losing the White vote.

Naturally, the Democratic Establishment, most of the mainstream media and the (((Alt-Lite))) is blaming this phenomenon on the “radical Left” (i.e. people like Cortez, Waters, Keith Ellison, etc.) via the #WalkAway meme.

They want the face of the Democratic Party to be Biden, Hillary or Warren.

We want it to be Cortez, Waters and hopefully someday Oprah Winfrey or the Black actress that played in Ghostbusters.

They want to blame #WalkAway on “radicals”, we want to blame it on moderates.

Luckily, while they are somewhat coordinated in their approach, they are also not very smart so hijacking the Democratic Party in the name of non-White fascism will be just as easy as co-opting the late GOP for the Fourth Reich.

The answer, as you may have guessed, lies in the first proverb.

Tyrone’s Project for a New Pan-American Century

(also called the Reverse Sailer Strategy)

If the 2016 campaign has taught us anything, it’s that we can’t rely on the white vote anymore. Not only are whites in the process of becoming a rightfully despised and politically isolated minority, they have also shown that they will always choose to protect their privileges over doing what right for our communities. It’s time to choose the future, it’s time to choose people of color.

๐Ÿคฃ๐Ÿคฃ๐Ÿคฃ

The problem with [Moderate]’s campaign is that (s)he’s trying to be a Donald Trump-lite. But white people, as they have consistently showed us over the course of the last elections, will always prefer the original to the imitation. What we need isn’t another compromise with Trump/the GOP, what we need is a new vision for our party. At some point, “we are the future” has to be more than a slogan – it has to stand for something. It has to mean that we are willing to invest in minorities.

๐Ÿคฃ๐Ÿคฃ๐Ÿคฃ

Everyone says that Donald Trump’s campaign has brought out the worst of the white vote… but that’s not true, it was always there. There’s nothing new about racist white people voting for Trump. They voted for Trump in the same way they voted for Romney, and McCain before that. Racist white people were as surprised as anyone when their candidate, Donald Trump, won the general election. What has changed is that people of color and minorities, the fastest growing demographic in the USA, no longer vote as enthusiastically or as consistently for our candidates. That is something [Moderate] has refused to address or even acknowledge, which is why (s)he will lose… and yet this election doesn’t have to be a 2016-part-II. [Radical] can bring out the minority vote as much, if not more, than Barack Obama could in 2008.

๐Ÿคฃ๐Ÿคฃ๐Ÿคฃ

The problem with [Moderate]’s campaign is that it has no chance of winning against the emboldened Republicans. [Moderate] is focusing on a demographic we can’t win – white people – while ignoring the much more progressive, politically stable, not to mention expanding, demographic that we need to win – the minority vote.

๐Ÿคฃ๐Ÿคฃ๐Ÿคฃ

Is [Moderate] a Donald Trump plant? The question deserves to be asked. The path to victory is pretty clear: appeal to disenfranchised minorities. And yet what is [Moderate] doing? Ignoring minorities while playing second fiddle to Donald Trump’s white populist base. The Democratic Party, snatching defeat from the jaws of victory since 2004.

๐Ÿคฃ๐Ÿคฃ๐Ÿคฃ

What happens when you ignore the minority vote for the sake of “party unity”? Ask Al Gore. Ask John Kerry. Ask Hillary Clinton (twice). Ask [Moderate] in a few months, when (s)he loses to Donald Trump/[generic Republican] because (s)he followed the losing strategy of ignoring the minority vote while focusing on the lost cause of flyover country.

๐Ÿคฃ๐Ÿคฃ๐Ÿคฃ

Why are we making the same mistakes over and over again? Even the other side knows better than that, and they showed it when they said NO to their moderate candidate (Jeb Bush) and voted for the radical one (Donald Trump). You can only fight fire with fire. It should be our turn to say NO to the fallacy of “moderation” and embrace our values, those of [Radical]’s campaign, but instead we continue down the same path that brought us Donald Trump. It’s a sad day for our party, and our country, if [Moderate] wins the primary/seat/election.

๐Ÿคฃ๐Ÿคฃ๐Ÿคฃ

Simply put, a vote for [Moderate] is a vote for Trump. Not only are their positions virtually indistinguishable from one another, but [Moderate] is only popular among those who already vote for Trump… white people. And the reason (s)he is popular is because they KNOW that (s)he will lose to him, badly, like Hillary Clinton in 2016.

๐Ÿฎ Covert Sexual Supremacy ๐Ÿฎ

๐Ÿฎ Covert Sexual Supremacy ๐Ÿฎ

Overt and Covert Supremacy.

Overt and Covert White Supremacy.

Finally!

This is a concept I’ve been eager to write about for a long time, probably since I started this blog, but I wanted to be sure that the SJW crowd had officialized the terminology to avoid pointless revisions that could tarnish this moment of absolute ideological subversion of anti-White politics.

It took them long enough, but anti-White finally realized that racism is not just an insult your hurl at wrong-thinking White people, it’s a spectrum.

As you all know, if anti-racist is a code word for anti-White, the corollary is that “racist” is just a code word for White.

Now you can prove it using your own anti-White rhetoric, and watch normies realize all by themselves that diversity is, indeed, about chasing down every last White person… into the open arms of the Fourth Reich. Like floss to a meme.

Tyrone Trump, rule 63.

Tyrone Trump, rule 63.

But it gets better… You can now hierarchize the gravity of racism based on your own interpretation of the Overt/Covert spectrum.

Anti-Whites say that “Neon Nazis” are the archetypal racial evil, and the most dangerous enemy of holy diversity.

Not true. Neon Nazis may be the most extreme, the most radical, the most fanatic, but they’re aren’t the most dangerous racial evil… because they are straightforward about their racism.

Thanks to these anti-White retards who put “lynching” and “racist mascots” on the same spectrum, there is now a direct link and PC-approved nexus between the most stereotypical WW2 propaganda caricature and basic bitch SWPL All Lives Matter.

As I always say: “You must think with your dick before you rape with your mind“. And indeed, now is the time to transpose my sexual depravity into the penultimate cultural perversion of SJW dogma.

Because the reality is that, whatever Hollywood told you about the KKK and other overt White Supremacists, the real danger comes from the covert side.

Colonialism, Slavery, Auschwitz, Smallpox blankets? They all pale in comparison to Eurocentric curricula.

Anyone talking about pro-Whites being racists is obviously engaged in racism themselves.

Let Shontavia J. Bonobo explain…

To those “white allies” who believe that denouncing Donald Drumpff and the KKK is enough… how stupid do you think we are? EVERYONE KNOWS Drumpff and the KKK are racist, which is why it’s perfectly innocuous to talk about it. The real racism, the one that has been damaging the lives of People of Color at the hands of white colonialists since time immemorial, is the one not being discussed. It’s all the so called “progressives” who “celebrate diversity” with one hand while stabbing People of Color in the back with the other. It’s all the white women who “talk the talk” about rejecting white supremacy, only to vote the Donald Drumpff the moment they can get a better deal from the other side. It’s all these “white allies” who won’t SHUT UP AND LISTEN to People of Color and Minorities, and instead insist on showcasing their “tolerant” opinions by silencing Women of Color and Minorities.

Donald Drumpff is obviously a racist, he may even be the most racist person in Amerikkka today. But he’s not the one who normalized racism and xenophobia. He’s only the bow of the ship, not the motor. He’s the spearhead, not the one actually holding and using the spear.

Multiculturalism, 1965-2018.
May you rest in piece.

The anti-White moral compass has been permanently jammed by the intrusion of a titanic phallic instrument in its ideological vagina, so violently was it raped that it will forever point to the Reich, making it useless for ordinary virtue signaling and political navigation purposes.

Dicks out.

๐Ÿ’Ž Fascism as a Form of Proto-Phallic Warfare ๐Ÿ’Ž

๐Ÿ’Ž Fascism as a Form of Proto-Phallic Warfare ๐Ÿ’Ž

Phallic War Now.

Phallic War Now.

Most of the sheeit I write about deals with political and cultural tactics – see here and here – or even techniques – see here – but there is little about principles and strategies on this blog.

It has been posited that White suffer from less ethnocentrism in comparison to other races, some would even claim that Whites are less tribal in nature.

While I can agree with the first premise, the latter is more problematic.

Whites are very tribal, the problem is that their tribal identity is steered away from nationalism into counterproductive idiocy.

Call a black man a nigger, call a men’s right activist (MRA) or a feminist (SHIT) a loser who can’t get laid… same reaction.

Same reaction not just from the person insulted, which would be understandable in any context, but also from the rest of the “community”. A collective insult, something that should only be possible when a member of a tribe is insulted by an outsider.

It’s problematic because while Niggerdom is a real nation/tribe, neither MRA nor feminism are anything more than abstract ideological piss that wouldn’t exist if not for White people’s lack of tribal bladder control.

What are the other “tribes” competing against nationalism?

  • religion (Catholic, Protestant, Muslim, magic soil)
  • political ideology (left, right, conservative, liberal, libertarian)
  • sex and sexual identity (women, men, faggots)
  • class (rich, middle class, blue-collar, white-collar)
  • ethnic culture (Hispanic, Middle-Eastern, Anglophone)
  • consumerism (fashion, sub-cultures, fandom, consumer products)
  • hobbies (gamers, PUA, sport fans, gun culture)

Basically, anything than can be used as a substitute tribal identity.

Tyrone Trump, rule 63.

Tyrone Trump, rule 63.

R.I.S.C.C.C.H. for short, although some categories can appear redundant.

You’ll notice that aside from sex and arguably class, they are all absolutely artificial and both socially constructed as well as socially policed.

I think it was Bob Whitaker that called them wordists.

Another telling sign is that when an artificial tribe is formed, the official ‘enemy’ is also cast in a parallel artificial group.

  • Catholic <-> Protestants / Freemasons
  • Hispanic <-> Anglo
  • Middle-Eastern <-> Occidental
  • Gamers <-> Journalists (as in actual journalists, not a euphemism for YKW)
  • Conservative <-> Progressives

It’s particularly visible amongst the traditional Catholics, who list all the problems caused or exacerbated by the presence of jews in White countries, only to blame… Freemasons, the Illuminati or the Enlightenment. You see the same dynamic with Islamic fundamentalists – but not with Arab nationalists – who go on about ‘zionists’, ‘imperialists’, sometimes ‘neocons’ but very rarely jews.

I’m sure part of it is intentional misdirection, as many others have speculated.

But you never see a coalition of ‘Conservatives/Liberals/Gays/Women against Arabs/Blacks/Yellow/Whites’.

A fake tribe needs a fake enemy.

So what’s the solution?

The (Final) Solution

The solution is to join the Church of Scientology, a wonderful place where you can get laid and eat peanut butter.

Other than that you can use the Tyrone Doctrine, it was made for alienating (White) people from their various subcultures after all.

Just throw them out unceremoniously. “X has no place for racist White males“, etc, y’all know the Tyrone drill by now.

I seriously believe that once all fake tribes are dismantled, everyone will just go back to being a fascistic personality disorder and having a racist.

Faux tribalism is the flood bank preventing the rise of the New Aryan Order.

Some perspective.

In fact, since the organic collectivism of race, tribe, and family are all but forbidden, we see the emergence of the most toxic individualism/collectivism of all: consumerism. Humans are social creatures by nature, so we see laughably artificial โ€œtribesโ€ forming around such trivialities as music styles, fashion, films, and cringe-worthy fandom based on TV cartoons such as anime.

Libertarianism, Individualism, Collectivism, and Anime

Also.

The cult of individualism is killing us. Think of a biological allegory. A higher mammal is made up of a complex system of specialized cells. No cell is an โ€œindividual.โ€

An individual cell canโ€™t be anything more than an ameba. Reading the comments from โ€œgamersโ€ on the SocialMatter โ€œGamergateโ€ article was revealing โ€“ the self-described โ€œgamersโ€ all insisted they were individuals and their cultures were defined by consumer products โ€“ the video games they played and various artificial โ€œculturesโ€ they were involved in that were defined by consumer products.

Not a work from any of them about spouses or children โ€“ or parents โ€“ nothing organic to their social life. It was all MEDIATED by consumer products and โ€œidentitiesโ€ based on consumer products.

Not coincidentally, they all were insistent that โ€œrace, sex, nonbinary gender, orientation didnโ€™t matter.โ€

It hardly needs to be pointed out how utterly shallow such an existence and โ€œcultureโ€ really is. A culture based around staring at blinking lights and twitching fingers in an electronic feedback loop.

Mark Yuray: Doing Social Conservatism Right

As always, stay fashy.

Dicks out.