As was noted elsewhere on this blog, the defining element of White anti-Whiteness is the tendency to bet on every side, as long as the return on investment is positive.
The payout in roulette is usually 35x so betting everywhere (or at all) is stupid, but if the rate was 50x it would be stupid NOT to use that strategy.
Similarly, White anti-Whites will be ‘WN’ just long enough to guarantee their personal comfort before going back to the most caricatural forms of anti-racist (i.e. anti-White) virtue signalling.
They get both:
1) the more tangible benefits of White Nationalism (segregation, micro-tribalism, etc)
2) the more abstract benefits of being ‘against waycism’ (status, faux elitism, etc)
The most evident stereotype is, as the Brits call them, caviar socialists living in gated communities and complaining about the ‘waycism’ and ‘insecurities’ of those bigots who actually have experienced diversity (i.e. White Genocide).
They will only be White nationalists long enough to defend their territory, and likewise will be ‘anti-racists’ as long as their interests aren’t personally involved.
Territory here has a wider meaning than just neighborhood, gated communities or even physical area – any group, tribe or ideology they aspire to can be considered territory (=> gamergate, Taylor Swift, etc).
This strategy will continue as long as the return on investment is a net positive, in others words as long as the payout rate is superior to 37x/38x.
The purpose of the Tyrone Doctrine is to artificially lower the rate, invalidating the aforementioned strategy and forcing ‘normies’ to pick a side – which nine times out of ten will be WN, because concrete concerns usually beat abstract ideologies when they are in conflict with one another.
How is it done? Simply by attacking SWPL ‘territories’ from ‘the Left’ – i.e. accusing them of racism in the most obnoxious way possible.
The goal of the Tyrone Doctrine is to transform the dual advantage of White anti-Whites into a double penance.
Currently: Anti-Whites can be neither pro-White nor anti-White yet reap the benefits of both, while bearing zero of their liabilities.
With the Tyrone Doctrine: To not be pro-White is to be anti-White in the eyes of the pro-Whites, and vice-versa (to not be anti-White is to be a KKKNaziHitler, etc).
While everyone is masturbating to Hitler, Goebbels, Evola and Céline, the truth way laid bare much more recently by George W. Bush himself: “You’re either with us or with the terrorists“.
The ‘opposite’ – a complementary force actually – of the Tyrone Doctrine is what we could call the W Doctrine (for Walker or Whitaker).
And somewhere in the middle you have the F Doctrine (for Faggot or Flaming Faggot or Richard Fpenfer), which is 100% normie territory.
The goal of course is polarization, T and W to the exclusion of F.
There are too many WNs anyway, I can’t remember their names and don’t care enough to learn anything about them.
What we need are more T and W disruption of ‘normal’ sub-culturalism.
Example with game.
F Doctrine: Basic bitch game… about game. And nothing else. RSD, most ‘PUA’ material. Basic bitch normie land.
W Doctrine: Heartiste, Return of Kings, etc.
T Doctrine: Obnoxious fat anti-racist feminist (probably jewish) claiming that ALL game – particularly F – is another Hololost, and that all White males deserve to be castrated, mutilated or put to death ‘for the children’.
There’s also another category, the D Doctrine (for Daddy or BigDik): the retarded negro who wants to jizz all over dem wyte wiminz. But he’s irrelevant, except for comic relief.
In any system which includes all three categories, W and T will be complementary at the expense of F… aka polarization, aka sheeit I’ve written about forever.
The symbiotic nature of W and D is pretty evident and constitutes the basics of pseudo-political ‘outrage porn’ clickbait, but it’s even more efficient when taken outside the strict confines of the political arena.
Example with movies reviews.
F Doctrine: Basic bitch commentary, “great performance by Christian Bale in a beautiful, brutal and flawed incarnation of muh dick“, burn this sheeeit with Zyklon-B.
T Doctrine: No review, mostly ad hominems against the fans of the movie/genre or anyone not possessing the proper opinions. “Straight out of Mein Kampff“, “an apology of fascism, White privilege and hate“, etc… the more retarded the better.
W Doctrine: Mostly reactionary, offering a counterpoint to T. “You won’t believe what this fat cunt sheboon feminists […]“, “Anti-white jews attack The Dark Knight“, “So now Christian Bale is Hitler according to jews“.
Also I’m a gay cuck and sex with marsupials is trad.
That’s how the game is played.